[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] OT Re: An important technical consideration about nature of the service (was Re: The overflowing list )

[David Cake]

And thank you IETF, RDAP is great. 
But as Andrew says, it does not magically solve all our problems, because many of them are not its role to solve. 

David

> On 26 Jul 2016, at 2:13 AM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 08:19:50PM +0530, Sivasubramanian M wrote:
>> Great. Then the IETF could pay attention to the complexities of matters
>> concerning Registrant Data.
> 
> The IETF cheerfully did that, and delivered to you and everyone else
> RDAP, which is designed precisely to provide the sort of ability to
> distribute data selectively.
> 
> The IETF also cheerfully did that, and delivered to you and everyone
> else EPP, which is designed precisely to allow co-ordination across
> various operators of infrastructure.
> 
> But given the degree to which distinctions in this area are being
> hand-waved together as all the same problem, I'm not even sure what
> we're talking about under the rubric "complexities of matters
> concerning Registrant Data".
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> A
> 
> -- 
> Andrew Sullivan
> ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg