[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Pros and Cons of Three Initial Reports & Comment Periods in Phase 1 v. Two Initial Reports

[DANIEL NANGHAKA]

Thanks for sharing the update

On Monday, June 20, 2016, Gomes, Chuck <cgomes at verisign.com> wrote:

> In an effort to try to summarize the debate that occurred in our WG call
> last week, on the list since then and in leadership team discussions, I
> created the attached list of Pros and Cons of Three Initial Reports &
> Comment Periods in Phase 1 instead of two as contained in our current Work
> Plan.  As I think everyone knows, a suggestion was made to cover the ‘big
> three’ charter question areas (purpose, privacy, data elements) first and
> getting public feedback on those areas before considering the areas of
> accuracy and gated access; I then suggested that that could result in three
> Initial Reports for Phase 1.
>
>
>
> I hope I included all the main pros and cons that have been communicated
> and that I accurately described them.  I apologize if that is not the
> case.  Regardless, it seems clear to me that there are good arguments on
> both sides and there does not appear to be consensus either way, so the
> leadership team will propose an approach that hopefully will address
> concerns on both sides.
>
>
>
> The leadership team plans to distribute a revised approach for reaching
> consensus decisions prior to the WG call this week.
>
>
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
Sent from Gmail Mobile
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20160620/13056dc6/attachment.html>