[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] [renamed] Key early questions
james at cyberinvasion.net
Wed May 11 18:31:57 UTC 2016
I would suggest that needs likely is stretch, but rather might be useful is a better characterisation, and this is something that the group will assess in due course when we get to that stage of our deliberations.
On 11/05/2016, 19:28, "gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org on behalf of Denny Watson" <gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org on behalf of watson at spamhaus.org> wrote:
>Geoffrey Noakes wrote:
>> Adding to what Steve writes: a great deal of the Internet trust model is based on Certification Authorities (“CAs”, like Symantec, Comodo, DigiCert, Entrust, GlobalSign, and others), who rely on WHOIS data as one of the first sources of data that attests to “who is this site I am working with, and how do I know that to be true”. Any changes to WHOIS must take into account these other “contracted parties”.
>Let me simply this; There is a wealth of data that needs to be provided
>in the public interest.
>gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
>gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
More information about the gnso-rds-pdp-wg