[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Proposed Agenda for RDS PDP WG Meeting Tuesday 25 April 16.00 UTC

[Alan Greenberg]

Agree. It is not as if we had already settled all of the policy and 
now have spare time on our hands to consider implementation (which we 
are largely not well equipped to do anyways).

Alan

At 27/04/2017 10:02 AM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:

>I think that's worrying about operational matters that are mostly just
>configuration.  This group should set some policies and permit the
>operators to figure out how to implement them, as long as we don't
>attempt to constrain operations to unreasonable levels of service.  (I
>think a requirement for an RDS that is guaranteed synched with the
>registry/repository database would be too high; I think a requirement
>that the RDS normally not lag by more than (say) an hour would be well
>within the bounds of operational reason.)
>
>Best regards,
>
>A
>
>--
>Andrew Sullivan
>ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
>_______________________________________________
>gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
>gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg