[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Article 29 Working Party to ICANN

[Hollenbeck, Scott]

From: gnso-rds-pdp-wg [mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Michele Neylon - Blacknight
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2017 11:10 AM
To: Richard Leaning <rleaning at ripe.net>; Chuck <consult at cgomes.com>
Cc: gnso-rds-pdp-wg <gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Article 29 Working Party to ICANN



Dick



We have been thinking about what it means in reality, as we are the ones who will have to implement it.



For now, I can see a situation where a registrar will end up running RDAP with ACLs. And there’ll be layers of access with logging etc.,



[SAH] It doesn’t have to be implemented that way, Michele. It can be, of course, be federated authentication gives us another option. Making a federated system work will require cooperation among identity providers and relying parties, and ICANN might be able to play a role in facilitating that cooperation.



Scott

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20171211/efdc90e0/attachment.html>