[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Hamilton Memo #3 Published

John Bambenek jcb at bambenekconsulting.com
Sat Dec 23 02:48:21 UTC 2017


Well I suppose if I was speaking in my own interest, I would have brought up that no one has yet gotten a legal opinion of my whois privacy for free proposal. But I didn’t. Also its Christmas. We can fight about this more next year. 

--
John Bambenek

> On Dec 22, 2017, at 20:37, "benny at nordreg.se" <benny at nordreg.se> wrote:
> 
> I didn’t expect you to not read it, it was a comment only based on that everyone in the group should read it all to get a full understanding of it....
> 
> Quoting whatever suits ones own interests will in general not give a meaningful progress for RDS work, the answers in the memorandum are to vague and depending on other preferences to stand alone as a definitive answer. A guidance at the best...
> 
> And to be clear “own interest” are nothing personal just generally speaking.
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On 23 Dec 2017, at 08:21, John Bambenek <jcb at bambenekconsulting.com> wrote:
> 
>> I did read the whole paper. I excerpted a quote. 
>> 
>> --
>> John Bambenek
>> 
>> On Dec 22, 2017, at 18:10, "benny at nordreg.se" <benny at nordreg.se> wrote:
>> 
>>> Well it’s  worth to read the full paper before concluding..
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>> 
>>> On 22 Dec 2017, at 21:32, John Bambenek via gnso-rds-pdp-wg <gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> From page 12:
>>>> 
>>>> In our opinion, public access to (limited) Whois data would therefore be of preference and necessary to fulfill the above purposes in a practical and efficient way. In section 2.8 below, we will discuss if such public access could be possible in light of the GDPR.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> John Bambenek
>>>> 
>>>> On Dec 22, 2017, at 07:56, Chuck <consult at cgomes.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> From: David Olive <david.olive at icann.org>
>>>>> Date: December 21, 2017 at 8:23:35 PM GMT-5
>>>>> To: "so-ac-sg-cleaders at icann.org" <so-ac-sg-cleaders at icann.org>
>>>>> Subject: [So-ac-sg-cleaders] Latest Hamilton legal analysis published
>>>>> 
>>>>> Dear Community Leaders:
>>>>> 
>>>>>  
>>>>> Part 3 of the Hamilton’s legal analysis has been published on the ICANN GDPR Legal Analysis page[icann.org].
>>>>>  
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> A blog[icann.org] from Göran has been published as well. 
>>>>>  
>>>>>  
>>>>> Regards.   David 
>>>>>  
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
>>>>> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
>>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
>>>> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20171222/41f0410f/attachment.html>


More information about the gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list