[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Proposed resolution for raw poll data

[Stephanie Perrin]

I actually cannot believe we are having this debate.  We accept 
wholesale disclosure of personal data in the WHOIS, and the group of 
people assembled to discuss the matter as a working group and set policy 
are offended by airing their own views, and want anonymity??? Unbelievable.

I support Ayden's comments, not because I don't trust anyone but as a 
matter of principle.

However, this discussion has proven one thing we will not have to argue 
about in future, timestamps and IP address are personal information.  
Time saved there Chuck!

Cheers Stephanie

On 2017-01-30 08:38, Michele Neylon - Blacknight wrote:
>
> Well yes, there is that too J
>
> --
>
> Mr Michele Neylon
>
> Blacknight Solutions
>
> Hosting, Colocation & Domains
>
> https://www.blacknight.com/
>
> http://blacknight.blog/
>
> Intl. +353 (0) 59  9183072
>
> Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
>
> Social: http://mneylon.social
>
> Some thoughts: http://ceo.hosting/
>
> -------------------------------
>
> Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business 
> Park,Sleaty
>
> Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland  Company No.: 370845
>
> *From: *Sam Lanfranco <sam at lanfranco.net>
> *Date: *Monday 30 January 2017 at 13:25
> *To: *Michele Neylon <michele at blacknight.com>, Ayden Férdeline 
> <icann at ferdeline.com>, RDS PDP WG <gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Proposed resolution for raw poll data
>
> I might add that without proper agreement by each individual, to 
> disclosure of past data would put the WG in violation of the law in a 
> number of jurisdictions.
> Also, in a move to disclosure, each participant would have to 
> expressly agree (consensus could not be binding on all).
> Those who do not agree would probably have to not participate, since 
> macro data and the majority of disclosed results would leave them 
> identifiable.
>
> Sam L.
>
> On 1/30/2017 8:04 AM, Michele Neylon - Blacknight wrote:
>
>     Ayden
>
>     I have no issue with “raw” or “processed” data being shared BUT
>     only for future polls where people know that the data is going to
>     be shared in that manner.
>
>     Doing it retroactively is not a good idea and I would oppose it.
>
>     Regards
>
>     Michele
>
>    < rest deleted >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20170130/1e37cf0e/attachment.html>