[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Proposed resolution for raw poll data
James Galvin
jgalvin at afilias.info
Mon Jan 30 19:40:05 UTC 2017
While this is not the choice I would have made, I want to thank the
leadership team for identifying this reasonable and rational compromise
that I can live with and will support going forward.
As for my position, Stephanie’s message later in this thread comes to
mind…
Jim
On 28 Jan 2017, at 20:56, Lisa Phifer wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Earlier this month, a request was made to publish "raw data" for WG
> member
> polls. The leadership team examined Survey Monkey poll data exports
> that
> might satisfy this request and realized that all contained fields that
> may
> pose a privacy concern to some: WG member name, IP address, and
> timestamps.
> To take into consideration WG member wishes for both privacy and
> transparency, our 18 January poll sought input on concerns (if any) on
> personal data that you would prefer not be included in raw data that
> might
> be published for future WG polls.
>
> During our 24 January call, the request to publish raw data and WG
> member
> responses were discussed. Most objected to including the IP address of
> the
> device used to take a poll; one-third objected to including WG member
> name
> and/or PDFs of individual poll responses. After lengthy discussion,
> several
> WG members indicated that an explanation of the problem to be solved
> by
> publishing raw data was needed before deciding to include these or
> other new
> fields in published results.
>
> Noting the WG's desire to focus on substantive deliberation at this
> time,
> the leadership team proposes the following next steps to resolve the
> original request for raw data.
>
> (1) To be responsive to both the request for raw data and WG member
> concerns about fields currently contained in Survey Monkey exports, we
> will
> post an XLS export of all poll data gathered without the IP address,
> WG
> member name, and timestamp columns which will be deleted from the
> exported
> XLS prior to posting. This raw data XLS will be published in addition
> to our
> usual aggregate result summary PDF for all future polls.
>
>
>
> (2) Anyone who wishes may propose to the WG mailing list more data
> they
> would like to see added to future published poll results, along with
> rationale about the problem that adding that data would address. Any
> such
> proposals will be discussed and refined primarily via the WG email
> list (and
> perhaps polling) to focus WG call time on deliberation of charter
> questions
> and key concepts.
>
> While (1) may end up being sufficient, (2) allows for further WG
> discussion
> about additional steps.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Lisa
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20170130/24f0b5e9/attachment.html>
More information about the gnso-rds-pdp-wg
mailing list