[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Discussion Topics

[Chuck Gomes Consulting]

That is correct John.

 

Chuck

 

From: John Bambenek [mailto:jcb at bambenekconsulting.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 11:03 AM
To: Chuck Gomes Consulting <consult at cgomes.com>
Cc: RDS WG <gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Discussion Topics

 

To emphasize this is whether they should be collected AT ALL and NOT discussion on WHO gets access and why, correct?

--

John Bambenek


On Jul 19, 2017, at 12:49, Chuck Gomes Consulting <consult at cgomes.com <mailto:consult at cgomes.com> > wrote:

Here are the list discussion topics in preparation for next week’s WG meeting:

*	Any topics related to the survey that will be distributed later today.

*	Collecting the data element ‘Registrant’ for the RDS
*	Collecting the data element ‘Registrant Organization’ for the RDS
*	Collecting the data element ‘Registrant Country’ for the RDS
*	Collecting the data element ‘Registrant Contact’ in the RDS.

*	Any topics related to collecting the following data elements* for the RDS:

*	Admin Contact & Contact ID
*	Technical Contact & Contact ID
*	Privacy/Proxy Provider Contact & Contact ID
*	Reseller
*	Registrar Abuse Contact Email Address
*	Registrar Abuse Contact Phone
*	URL of Internic Complaint Site (ICANN Whois Data Problem Reporting System)
*	Original Registration Date

 

* Note that most WG members who responded to last week’s poll supported collecting these data elements for the RDS.

 

If you have any questions, please ask them.

 

Chuck

_______________________________________________
gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org <mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org> 
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20170719/75058fe9/attachment.html>