[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] IMPORTANT: Invitation for Poll from 25 July Meeting

[Chuck Gomes Consulting]

Kris,

 

The turnaround time for polls is already very short so that withdrawing them and re-issuing them is not practical without causing further delays.  Please express your views in the comment boxes.

 

Chuck

 

From: gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Kris Seeburn
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2017 8:59 PM
To: Greg Aaron <gca at icginc.com>
Cc: gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
Subject: Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] IMPORTANT: Invitation for Poll from 25 July Meeting

 

I pretty much agree. Can I suggest we edit the poll and resend to see.

Kris


On 26 Jul 2017, at 05:14, Greg Aaron <gca at icginc.com <mailto:gca at icginc.com> > wrote:

I’m really surprised that this new poll doesn’t present an option that reflects current ICANN policy.   Current ICANN policy requires three means (email, postal, phone).  The options that Lisa presented in the last poll and then in the new one today limit to one or two required means. 

 

6. Proposed WG Agreement #30  

In the 25 July call, both support and opposition were expressed for the following key concept, derived from last week's poll results:

In addition to email address, data enabling one alternative method of contact must be collected and included in the RDS.

The following alternative phrasing has also been proposed:

Data enabling one or more alternative or preferred methods of contact may also be optionally collected and included in the RDS.

Please indicate below whether you agree with either or neither phrasing of this key concept. To suggest an alternative phrasing for this key concept, use the comment box to do so and explain why.

a) Agree: In addition to email address, data enabling one alternative method of contact must be collected and included in the RDS.

b) Agree: Data enabling one or more alternative or preferred methods of contact may also be optionally collected and included in the RDS.

c) Disagree with this key concept, regardless of phrasing

d) Unsure, No Opinion, or Propose Alternative given in comment box below

 

 

When I filled out the poll today I proposed the following alternative:

“In addition to email address, data enabling AT LEAST ONE alternative method of contact must be collected and included in the RDS.”

 

Like I said, I’m surprised that this new poll doesn’t present an option that reflects current ICANN policy.   If you don’t present that as one of the choices, it won’t get support because it’s not in front of people.  

 

All best,

--Greg

 

 

 

From: gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org <mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org>  [mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Lisa Phifer
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2017 8:19 PM
To: gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org <mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org> 
Subject: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] IMPORTANT: Invitation for Poll from 25 July Meeting
Importance: High

 

Dear all,

 

In follow-up to this week’s WG meeting, all RDS PDP WG Members are encouraged to participate in the following poll:

 

 <https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/ZF3VFJV> https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/ZF3VFJV

 

Responses should be submitted through the above URL. For offline reference, a PDF of poll questions can also be found at:

 

https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/66086734/Poll-from-25JulyCall.pdf

 

This poll will close at COB Saturday 29 July.  Poll results will be discussed in our 1 August WG meeting.

 

Please note that you must be a WG Member to participate in polls. If you are a WG Observer wishing to participate in polls, you must first contact gnso-secs at icann.org <mailto:gnso-secs at icann.org>  to upgrade to WG Member.

 

Regards,

Lisa

_______________________________________________
gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org <mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org> 
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20170726/47cc56ba/attachment-0001.html>