[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Review Tool for Responses from ccTLD Registry Operators' to Questions on Privacy, Data Protection and the GDPR

[Kris Seeburn]

Hi dick 

I personally feel we need to get some feedback from nro/aso because whilst we are visiting the fields some of the same are used on the iana with the rir. Since you are from ripe you would know how much info is collected and discussed displayed and how much of the are inaccurate and how much of these are also affecting the work we are doing on the group. I think we need to investigate this line as well to avoid duplication process. 

It's food for thought but I think it's worth looking at. Perhaps between those who are part of rir we could look at what we do and bring our bits here as a review. Else I would push it to nro/aso.

I personally feel when we are looking at the rdp a revamped Whois the RIRs are also concerned. 

That's my two cents but I feel we can make a better deal in one go than having too many committees.

Kris

> On 26 Jul 2017, at 17:01, Richard Leaning <rleaning at ripe.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi Kris,
> 
> Am part of this working group and also work for an RIR. If the WG feel the need to explore this more then am helping to help.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Dick
> 
> Richard Leaning
> External Relations
> RIPE NCC
> 
>> On 25 Jul 2017, at 05:38, Kris Seeburn <seeburn.k at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Amr
>> 
>> Perhaps we can drop same questions to the nro or aso. The Whois is also revealing. I know it may be outside a bit of scope but if you do a Whois not for domain but company name or individual names you could mine that for ip and emails.
>> 
>> I would believe some of these questions pertain to them also. Just a suggestion.
>> 
>> Kris
>> 
>>> On 25 Jul 2017, at 01:48, Amr Elsadr <amr.elsadr at icann.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi again, with apologies. This time, with the file attached.
>>>  
>>> Thanks again.
>>>  
>>> Amr
>>>  
>>> From: <gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Amr Elsadr <amr.elsadr at icann.org>
>>> Date: Monday, July 24, 2017 at 9:12 PM
>>> To: "gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org" <gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>
>>> Subject: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Review Tool for Responses from ccTLD Registry Operators' to Questions on Privacy, Data Protection and the GDPR
>>>  
>>> Dear Working Group Members,
>>>  
>>> Attached is a preliminary compilation of the responses received to-date from ccTLD registry operators, fashioned after public comment review tools used by GNSO WGs. You will also find the file posted on the WG wiki here: https://community.icann.org/x/rVjwAw
>>>  
>>> So far, we have only received responses from 3 ccTLDs:
>>>  
>>> .ME Registry
>>> IE Domain Registry (IEDR)
>>> Canadian Internet Registration Authority
>>>  
>>> The WG Leadership Team and staff are working together to follow-up with ccTLDs who have been contacted, but have not yet responded. The WG will be notified as additional responses are received.
>>>  
>>> Thanks.
>>>  
>>> Amr
>>> <Review Tool – Next Generation RDS PDP Working Group questions to ccTLDs.docx>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
>>> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
>> _______________________________________________
>> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
>> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20170726/78d4312c/attachment-0001.html>