[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Why the thin data is necessary
Sam Lanfranco
sam at lanfranco.net
Wed Jun 7 14:25:31 UTC 2017
As a participant in this pdp-wg discussion who will not be at the ICANN
meetings in Johannesburg I am probably speaking for many who will not be
there. We hope and pray that this rds-pdp-wg spends the time in
Johannesburg agreeing that /we have passed these four milestones/ on our
long march to policy recommendations, and it is now time to move on to
the rest of our tasks.
Sam Lanfranco
On 6/7/2017 10:13 AM, Greg Aaron wrote:
>
> Yes. Our Working Group has:
>
> * defined what the thin fields are,
> * has heard excellent reasons to publish it,
> * has not heard any compelling reasons to withhold the thin data
> from publication.
> * Had decent consensus that any kind of authentication or gating for
> access to thin data is not desirable.
>
> The discussion of the above has been pretty exhaustive. I suggest to
> the leadership that confirming and moving on from these issues is very
> important by Johannesburg. This WG has been open for one-and-a-half
> years now, needs to show some progress, and the endless re-opening of
> issues is not fair to any of the volunteers.
>
> All best,
>
> --Greg
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20170607/01e976ca/attachment.html>
More information about the gnso-rds-pdp-wg
mailing list