[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] The thin data
Andrew Sullivan
ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
Thu Jun 8 15:04:48 UTC 2017
On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 05:32:52AM -0400, Stephanie Perrin wrote:
> has influence over who gets access to the next tier of data. Let me repeat
> for greater clarity: I am not talking about thin data.
So we agree that the list of data that we had in the example I posted
several months ago, plus the data about DNSSEC that Jim Galvin
suggested on the call, is all fine and we can stop debating whether it
needs access controls? I would be pleased in that case, and then we
could move on to a real problem.
Best regards,
A
--
Andrew Sullivan
ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
More information about the gnso-rds-pdp-wg
mailing list