[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Who is in charge? (was Re: Why the thin data is necessary)]
Michele Neylon - Blacknight
michele at blacknight.com
Thu Jun 8 15:59:56 UTC 2017
Neil
I’m also a bit confused by this.
If the current whois were replaced by RDAP would you have issues with it?
Note I am talking solely about changing the technical system not any of the policies etc.,
Regards
Michele
--
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting, Colocation & Domains
https://www.blacknight.com/
http://blacknight.blog/
Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072
Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
Personal blog: https://michele.blog/
Some thoughts: https://ceo.hosting/
-------------------------------
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland Company No.: 370845
On 08/06/2017, 16:32, "gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org on behalf of Neil Schwartzman" <gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org on behalf of neil at cauce.org> wrote:
Allow me to restate: I object to place limits on access to WHOIS data.
> On Jun 8, 2017, at 3:50 PM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 02:17:58PM +0200, Neil Schwartzman wrote:
>>
>> That said gated access needs some sort of parsing model. which is why I object to it in any form.
>
> I don't understand this. RDAP is JSON. You can parse all day long.
>
> A
>
> --
> Andrew Sullivan
> ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
_______________________________________________
gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
More information about the gnso-rds-pdp-wg
mailing list