[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] List topics for this week
allison nixon
elsakoo at gmail.com
Wed Jun 14 17:16:50 UTC 2017
how are the discussion topics chosen? on the call? i can't make the calls
due to work.
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Gomes, Chuck via gnso-rds-pdp-wg <
gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org> wrote:
> One of the things we forgot to do at the end of our agenda yesterday was
> to identify the list discussion topics that everyone is asked to focus on
> this week. Fortunately as a result of the discussion in the meeting and
> the questions in the poll, it appears that most everyone naturally focused
> on the appropriate topics which include the questions in the poll as well
> as the tentative conclusions that were reached in the meeting. Here is a
> summary of the focus topics for this week:
>
>
>
> *New agreements reached and accepted as tentative conclusions*
>
> - The WG agreed to adopt the term "minimum public data set" to refer
> to the set of data elements deliberated thus far - that is, the list of
> fields that will always be public no matter the gTLD; short form focus
> topic = ‘minimum public data set’.
> - The WG agreed to add DNSSEC info to the ‘minimum public data set’;
> short form focus topic = ‘DNSSEC Info’.
> - The WG agreed that the expiration date should not be removed from
> the "Minimum Public Data Set"; short form of focus topic = ‘Expiration
> Date’.
>
>
>
> *From the poll*
>
> - Purposes of minimum public data set elements identified to date:
> - Domain name
> - Registrar name
> - Registrar ID (Registrar IANA ID)
> - Whois Server & Referral URL
> - Name Servers
> - Statuses
> - *Updated Date, Creation Date, Expiration Date*
>
> (These topics may be discussed as a whole or as individual discussion
> topics.)
>
>
>
> According to our recently instituted procedures, please limit list
> discussions to the above topics this week. As a reminder, the three rules
> that are particularly applicable are:
>
> 1. Discussion topics must be narrowly defined.
> 2. Responses must focus on the narrowly defined topics.
> 3. Ok to note dependency on another topic and state assumptions made,
> but keep focus on-topic.
>
>
>
> Thanks for your cooperation.
>
>
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
>
--
_________________________________
Note to self: Pillage BEFORE burning.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20170614/2364d196/attachment.html>
More information about the gnso-rds-pdp-wg
mailing list