[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] authoritative

[Volker Greimann]

This would lead to horrible policies as each policy would have to carry 
with it a definition dictionary that would potentially be inconsistent 
with that of other policies. So in one policy term X would mean A while 
in another it would mean B. This has the potential to quickly become 
unworkable. Best stick to existing definitions developed by previous 
groups and use different terms if we find that definition does not fit 
our purpose.

TL;DR: Just because we _can_ redefine any term to mean what we want does 
not mean that we _should_.


Volker


Am 02.05.2017 um 13:41 schrieb Greg Aaron:
> Regarding "authoritative": the solution is not to avoid a word because someone might possibly have another idea of what it means.  A solution is for the WG to settle on definitions and then use the words consistently.  That's what engineers and policy-makers do all the time in RFCs, and papers like SAC051 (which gave us some foundational terms), and WG reports.
>
> All best,
> --Greg
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Rob Golding
> Sent: Tuesday, May 2, 2017 7:31 AM
> To: Gnso-rds-pdp Wg <gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>
> Subject: Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] authoritative
>
>> By Authoritative are we meaning that
> Canonical ?
> Received ?
> Central ?
> Aggregated ?
>
>> I thought the recommendation was that we weren't meaning _anything_,
>> and that we just weren't going to use the term.
> Yes.
>
> Rob
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg

-- 
Bei weiteren Fragen stehen wir Ihnen gerne zur Verfügung.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen,

Volker A. Greimann
- Rechtsabteilung -

Key-Systems GmbH
Im Oberen Werk 1
66386 St. Ingbert
Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
Email: vgreimann at key-systems.net

Web: www.key-systems.net / www.RRPproxy.net
www.domaindiscount24.com / www.BrandShelter.com

Folgen Sie uns bei Twitter oder werden Sie unser Fan bei Facebook:
www.facebook.com/KeySystems
www.twitter.com/key_systems

Geschäftsführer: Alexander Siffrin
Handelsregister Nr.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken
Umsatzsteuer ID.: DE211006534

Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
www.keydrive.lu

Der Inhalt dieser Nachricht ist vertraulich und nur für den angegebenen Empfänger bestimmt. Jede Form der Kenntnisgabe, Veröffentlichung oder Weitergabe an Dritte durch den Empfänger ist unzulässig. Sollte diese Nachricht nicht für Sie bestimmt sein, so bitten wir Sie, sich mit uns per E-Mail oder telefonisch in Verbindung zu setzen.

--------------------------------------------

Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Best regards,

Volker A. Greimann
- legal department -

Key-Systems GmbH
Im Oberen Werk 1
66386 St. Ingbert
Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
Email: vgreimann at key-systems.net

Web: www.key-systems.net / www.RRPproxy.net
www.domaindiscount24.com / www.BrandShelter.com

Follow us on Twitter or join our fan community on Facebook and stay updated:
www.facebook.com/KeySystems
www.twitter.com/key_systems

CEO: Alexander Siffrin
Registration No.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken
V.A.T. ID.: DE211006534

Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
www.keydrive.lu

This e-mail and its attachments is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. Furthermore it is not permitted to publish any content of this email. You must not use, disclose, copy, print or rely on this e-mail. If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail, kindly notify the author by replying to this e-mail or contacting us by telephone.