[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Proposed Agenda for RDS PDP WG Meeting - Tuesday 9 May

[Maxim Alzoba]

Dear Terri, 

 Could you confirm that a meeting room was booked (can be booked)
 for the RDS participants at the venue of GDD Summit? 
(Internet connectivity required, audio - if possible).

P.s: it was one of the ideas, which I think was in the air during the last meeting.

Sincerely Yours,

Maxim Alzoba
Special projects manager,
International Relations Department,
FAITID

m. +7 916 6761580(+whatsapp)
skype oldfrogger

Current UTC offset: +2.00 (Madrid)

> On May 8, 2017, at 23:00, Gomes, Chuck via gnso-rds-pdp-wg <gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org> wrote:
> 
> Benny,
>  
> There are lots of other stakeholders involved in the RDS PDP WG besides registries and registrars and not all WG members from registries and registrars are involved in the summit.  Hopefully, those who are at the summit can still participate but, if not, they can listen to the recording and contribute on the list and in any poll that follows.
>  
> Chuck
>  
>   <>
> From: gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of benny at nordreg.se
> Sent: Monday, May 08, 2017 4:47 PM
> To: lisa at corecom.com
> Cc: gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Proposed Agenda for RDS PDP WG Meeting - Tuesday 9 May
>  
> Wondering why we have this call when a lot of us are attending GDD in Madrrid
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On 8 May 2017, at 19:42, Lisa Phifer <lisa at corecom.com <mailto:lisa at corecom.com>> wrote:
> 
> Dear all,
>  
> The next GNSO Next-Gen RDS PDP Working Group teleconference will take place on Tuesday 9 May at 16:00 UTC.
>  
> Below please find the proposed agenda for this meeting, along with links to meeting materials, which can be found on the meeting page:https://community.icann.org/x/EsPRAw <https://community.icann.org/x/EsPRAw>
>  
> Regards,
> Lisa
>  
> Proposed Agenda for the RDS PDP WG Meeting – Tuesday 9 May at 16:00 UTC 
>  
> 1) Roll Call/SOI Updates
> 2) Continue deliberation on the charter question/subquestion 5.1:
>    Should gTLD registration "thin data" be entirely public or should access be controlled?
>    a) Review of poll results: AnnotatedResultsV2-Poll-on-Purpose-from-2MayCall.pdf
>    b) Record rough consensus on WG agreement in Section 5.1 of working document:
>        "gTLD registration "thin data" should be accessible without requiring inquirers to identify themselves or state their purpose."
>    c) Deliberate on other possible requirement(s) for allowing access to "thin data"
>        (e.g., possible requirements for identification, authentication, and anti-abuse measures)
> 3) Finalize ccTLD questions and plan for distribution
> 4) Update on definition(s) to replace "authoritative"
> 5) Confirm action items and proposed decision points
> 6) Confirm next meeting date: 17 May 2017 at 05:00 UTC
>  
> Meeting Materials: https://community.icann.org/x/EsPRAw <https://community.icann.org/x/EsPRAw>
>  
>  
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org <mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg>_______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20170509/38df877e/attachment.html>