[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] IMPROTANT - Action Items and Notes from Next-Generation RDS PDP Working Group Call - 17 May 2017

[benny at nordreg.se]

And here Paul the logic are breaking

A domain are not a property, when registering a domain you only get the right to use is as long as you pay a fee for that.
If you go to lease/rent a car you are not entitled to know who has driven it before or what it has been used for.
Same if someone transfer the user rights for a phonenumber to you, that don’t give you any legal right to know who has used it before

IMHO this is one og the biggest misunderstandings of domains, it is not your property as a registrant, its a granted license as long as you pay the yearly nothing more nothing less. It’s pretty simple.

 

--
Med vänliga hälsningar / Kind Regards / Med vennlig hilsen

Benny Samuelsen
Registry Manager - Domainexpert

Nordreg AB - ICANN accredited registrar
IANA-ID: 638
Phone: +46.42197080
Direct: +47.32260201
Mobile: +47.40410200

> On 17 May 2017, at 19:52, Paul Keating <paul at law.es> wrote:
> 
> When you go to buy a used car would you think that knowing the history of
> ownership might be important?
> 
> When you buy a house, do you not believe that knowing who the prior owners
> were and verifying the validity of prior transfers was important?
> 
> When dealing with a trademark issue, do you not believe it important to be
> able to see the registration records and assignment histories?
> 
> 
> Please explain to me what is the difference with a domain name?
> 
> 
> Paul
> 
> On 5/17/17, 7:46 PM, "Jeremy Malcolm" <gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org
> on behalf of jmalcolm at eff.org> wrote:
> 
>> On 17/5/17 9:40 am, Michael Peddemors wrote:
>>> Yes, this is the common argument, however IMHO this is a red herring..
>>> There are more efficient ways for 'harvesters' to gain data, and
>>> others way to prevent such abuse..
>>> 
>>> Again, IMHO this argument is another case of impacting the many
>>> legitimate users, for the sake of a few bad apples..
>>> 
>>> And I havent' seen any arguments yet, of a case scenario which can't
>>> be addressed by other means..
>> 
>> So to reverse this, what are the *legitimate* purposes of harvesting?
>> 
>> -- 
>> Jeremy Malcolm
>> Senior Global Policy Analyst
>> Electronic Frontier Foundation
>> https://eff.org
>> jmalcolm at eff.org
>> 
>> Tel: 415.436.9333 ext 161
>> 
>> :: Defending Your Rights in the Digital World ::
>> 
>> Public key: https://www.eff.org/files/2016/11/27/key_jmalcolm.txt
>> PGP fingerprint: 75D2 4C0D 35EA EA2F 8CA8 8F79 4911 EC4A EDDF 1122
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
>> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg