[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] moving from authoritative to data of record

[Farell Folly]

Sorry for replying late. I agree with Sam and Cake.

Le mer. 17 mai 2017 à 13:51, Sam Lanfranco <sam at lanfranco.net> a écrit :

> I have been traveling and unable to join the adobe connect  calls but
> want to join in this chorus. My voice was for this approach from the
> start and the continued trouble with the term "authoritative" only added
> evidence to that position. Let's close this chapter and go with data of
> record.
>
> Sam Lanfranco
>
> On 5/16/2017 10:59 PM, David Cake wrote:
> > I’ve said before that it was the conclusion of the small group that the
> term ‘authoritative' was problematic because multiple uses of the term
> (both formal and informal) naturally apply in areas relevant to our Phase 1
> deliberations, and so is likely to cause confusion. Further discussions
> have demonstrated that this remains an issue even when we are aware of
> those issues.
> >
> > The term is referenced only in one requirement in our deliberations so
> far. The most recent version of that requirement and had relative agreement
> (84%) (but not consensus was: "A purpose of RDS is to facilitate
> dissemination of authoritatively-sourced gTLD registration data, such as
> domain names and their domain contacts and name servers, in accordance with
> applicable policy.”
> >
> > That was the most strongly supported wording of our poll on 28h of March.
> >
> > Following the recommendation of the small group that the term
> authoritative (and by extension, authoritatively), I recommend that we use
> none of the variations presented in that pol, but take the most strongly
> supported and remove the wording that directly references ‘authoritatively’.
> >
> > Instead, focussing on the idea that that requirement referred originally
> to the data theoretic sense of the term authoritative, I recommend that we
> consider a variation of that requirement that uses the term ‘data of
> record’, and replace 'authoritatively-sourced gTLD registration data” with
> 'gTLD registration data of record’’ so the wording becomes "A purpose of
> RDS is to facilitate dissemination of gTLD registration data of record,
> such as domain names and their domain contacts and name servers, in
> accordance with applicable policy.”
> >
> > In turn, we need to define the term ‘data of record’, and Andrew
> Sullivan has provided this definition  "the data set at a given time
> relevant to a given
> > registration object that expresses the data provided in the then-current
> registration for that object.”
> >
> > My intention is not to reject the idea of a requirement that specifies
> the source of the data, but that we make that requirement separate to the
> one about access to the data of record. Gpong forward I encourage Working
> Group members to find a requirements statement about the source of data
> that capture the idea of 'authoritatively sourced’ or similar for WG
> discussion.
> >
> > David
> > _______________________________________________
> > gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> > gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg

-- 
Regards
@__f_f__

PhD Candidate, Universität der Bundeswehr München
Computer Security | Internet of Things
about.me/farell
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20170519/f0bf6f1c/attachment.html>