[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Principle on Proportionality for "Thin Data"access

[allison nixon]

Revoking that data can't stop brute force transfer attempts, nor can it
stop spammers. Registrars sell domains in precisely 1 year blocks of time.
There is no uncertainty. I'm not sure these ideas are stemming from
analysis of any sort of threat model.

I actually like the idea of revoking all nameserver data. I like that idea
the more and more I think about it.

SOA data is almost always garbage. 95% of the time I find it useless.

On May 30, 2017 8:26 PM, "Rob Golding" <rob.golding at astutium.com> wrote:

> You're seriously proposing that registrars should not disclose the
>> status of a domain, like whether it is registered or not?
>>
>
> "status" in the whois/rds context is the field called status which lists
> the "locks" (or lack of - hence the security /abuse issue) of a domain
>
> If it's not registered it wont be in the database at all
>
> e.g.
>
> whois blahblah123.com
> No match for domain "BLAHBLAH123.COM".
>
> ^ This (potential) domain is not registered
>
> whois a-n-other.com
> Domain Status: OK
>
> ^ This domain is not locked
>
> Rob
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20170530/f97c13ee/attachment.html>