[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] FW: IMPORTANT

[jonathan matkowsky]

Chuck, I don’t understand how anyone can share government perspective, and
not represent a group in doing so.

I wanted to know whether leadership team has decided to conduct a DPIA, and
if so, whether you are using the UK’s guide. I would think while it makes
sense to be looking at the purposes of collection, what is primary and
secondary cannot be the focus because that presupposes knowing who the
controller is. We have not yet decided that as a working group. The memo
did not necessarily take into account the role of offering accreditation
services and ICANN’s mission.

But it appears whether it’s primary or secondary doesn’t matter for
purposes of defining purposes of collecting each data element.

We are not defining the purposes of collecting Whois data but the data
elements of the next generation of Whois. That’s what I meant the other day
regarding RDS.

To do that, we are not limited to the data elements that currently exist as
when we go through this exercise to fulfill ICANN’s mission from ICANN’s
perspective including all those involved in cybersecurity, or to offer
accredited registration services. The primary purpose of accredited
services is to fulfill the mission, and to provide that staple of a service
to those that register names with an accredited registrar. It seems we need
to carefully consider not only Spec 3 to the 2013 RAA but also Paragraph 14
to the 2017 global amendment to the registry agreement which says unique
DNS records may be supportable in the RDS if RDAP supports it. We therefore
need to know what RDAP can support, and at the very least need to consider
all elements from RFC 7485. This is not a simple exercise, and will take
**significant** time.

As we undertake this, we must know from WS law firm what role the public
directory service plays in the Privacy Directive, as I understand it is not
superseded by GDPR, and Whois is a public directory. This is critical
analysis we are possibly missing. Can you ask them to address this ASAP
please?

Thanks
Jonathan

On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 11:35 AM Chuck <consult at cgomes.com> wrote:

> We have 34 volunteers at present; it would help a lot if we could get a
> lot more so that teams will not have to cover more than one of the nine
> purposes.
>
>
>
> Thanks much to the 34 of you who have volunteered.  I hope many more will
> complete the poll and volunteer in the remaining 6 or so hours of the poll.
>
>
>
> We are particularly low for the government perspective.  Remember, team
> members are not being asked to represent any group but rather to share
> their understanding of the perspective.
>
>
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
> *From:* gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Lisa Phifer
> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 10, 2017 10:19 AM
> *To:* gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> *Subject:* [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] IMPORTANT: Invitation for Poll from 10
> October Meeting
> *Importance:* High
>
>
>
> Dear all,
>
>
>
> In follow-up to this week’s WG meeting, *all RDS PDP WG Members* are
> encouraged to participate in the following poll:
>
>
>
> https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/5LXJRF3
>
>
>
> Responses should be submitted through the above URL. For offline
> reference, a PDF of poll questions can also be found at:
>
>
>
>
> https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/66086772/Poll-from-10OctoberCall.pdf
>
>
>
> *This poll will close at COB Wednesday 11 October.  Expressions of
> interest gathered through this poll will be used form drafting teams.*
>
>
>
> Please note that you *must be a WG Member* to participate in polls. If
> you are a WG Observer wishing to participate in polls, you must first
> contact gnso-secs at icann.org to upgrade to WG Member.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Lisa
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg

-- 
Jonathan Matkowsky

-- 
*******************************************************************
This message was sent from RiskIQ, and is intended only for the designated 
recipient(s). It may contain confidential or proprietary information and 
may be subject to confidentiality protections. If you are not a designated 
recipient, you may not review, copy or distribute this message. If you 
receive this in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete 
this message. Thank you.

*******************************************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20171013/caa0bd98/attachment.html>