[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] ICANN Meetings/Conversations with Data Protection and Privacy Commissioners

[Sam Lanfranco]

I have to agree with Andrew here, and have a suggestion.

The Board will meet with whom they wish, but we can suggest that time be 
set aside, before or after they meet, for a public dialogue with the 
stakeholder constituencies of ICANN. That way we can hear what they are 
thinking on this particular issue, and share what we are thinking. This 
could be educational for all, and possibly clear the ground for more 
productive pdp-wg work, and a better common understanding as between the 
Board and the constituency groups.

While I can not be in Abu Dhabi, it might make excellent sense to block 
out a piece of that meeting program for this particular conversation 
with the Board.

This also may be a topic for the intersessional in February in L.A.

Sam L.


On 9/22/2017 11:20 AM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 03:15:58PM +0000, Vayra, Fabricio (Perkins 
> Coie) wrote:
>> Simply put, my concern is that these independent and misinformed 
>> conversations will result in bad decision making
> But what are the decisions that are being made? The decision-making 
> process is via PDP -- _this_ PDP.
>> if not render them useless altogether.
> If we worry about every occasion on which someone on the Internet is 
> wasting their time, we're _really_ going to be busy :-D A

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20170922/06f8b93f/attachment.html>