[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Letter from Article 29 WP to ICANN Org

[farzaneh badii]

Because no one this time can dispute the authority of the source.  It's the
guidance ICANN has been seeking for long from DPAs. There you have it.

Farzaneh

On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 5:20 PM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com>
wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 04:34:39PM -0400, Ayden Férdeline wrote:
> >
> > I know some will ask what is new. Nothing, if you read the recent paper
> from
> > the Berlin Group, as the Article 29 Working Party notes in their letter
> how
> > useful they found this report.
>
> So then why add it?  It's more stuff that everyone is supposed to have
> read, and it contributes nothing new to the considerations.  That
> seems like an example of, "Everything has been said, but not by
> everyone," and I think it is wasteful.
>
> A
>
> --
> Andrew Sullivan
> ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20180413/b76b7ae4/attachment.html>