[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] NTIA letter to ICANN re whois

Feher, Kal Kalman.Feher at team.neustar
Thu Apr 19 01:20:36 UTC 2018


I didn’t read the NTIA letter as endorsing rfc 8078 or the currently stalled operator to rrr draft. Although they mention DNSSEC in a prior sentence their suggestion is in fact to allow non Registrars to update NS and MX records. That brings us to the difference between domain control and domain ownership. One could make an argument to update DNSSEC material at the parent based purely on what one observes at the child, although I've heard cogent arguments against this from some registrars. But changing the delegation of a domain name should require a much clearer demonstration of ownership than simply the ability to update DNS records at the child. If there were going to be entities which could make these changes, they would need to prove quite clearly that the registrant had authorised them. If they weren’t registrars, any checks put in place to protect registrants from unscrupulous behaviours would make these entities look a lot like registrars.

I'm not really sure what the NTIA meant about updating MX records at the registry.

--
Kal Feher
Melbourne, Australia
Neustar
From: gnso-rds-pdp-wg <gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Andrew Sullivan <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com>
Date: Thursday, 19 April 2018 at 08:39
To: "gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org" <gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] NTIA letter to ICANN re whois

What exactly is wrong with the DNSSEC bits?  We even have an RRTYPE to make this possible.

--
Please excuse my clumbsy thums



On April 18, 2018 15:53:25 theo geurts <gtheo at xs4all.nl> wrote:

It's a very bad read.

The stuff about DNSSEC is so bad that it be can used in a Benny Hill sketch. But we can have a real discussion about DNSSEC at some point in another setting.

Theo

On 18-4-2018 21:35, farzaneh badii wrote:
well no ... but it's not a bad read :)

Farzaneh

On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 3:31 PM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com<mailto:ajs at anvilwalrusden.com>> wrote:
Ob.Nag: Is there anything new in that document?

On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 12:15:50PM -0700, John Bambenek via gnso-rds-pdp-wg wrote:
> Please include the following in documents for this wg.
>
> https://regmedia.co.uk/2018/04/17/ntia-icann-whois-apr18.pdf<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__regmedia.co.uk_2018_04_17_ntia-2Dicann-2Dwhois-2Dapr18.pdf&d=DwMFaQ&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=r-Nirn4kOYGkwbVx0VsP9wXIoGGzhrrchbSexWZfRoA&m=iVLK34TBKeI7rv7cV8VAGiUyIne73-fkIvNIuRpTNZs&s=0oDuz4tAi1OPItNk9YLTQijWM0G0EVao8am7FGECffU&e=>
>

> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_listinfo_gnso-2Drds-2Dpdp-2Dwg&d=DwMFaQ&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=r-Nirn4kOYGkwbVx0VsP9wXIoGGzhrrchbSexWZfRoA&m=iVLK34TBKeI7rv7cV8VAGiUyIne73-fkIvNIuRpTNZs&s=VK73sP1N2Kkzm0OvCP49V10JpXBCOSRJTBHb7sWq198&e=>


--
Andrew Sullivan
ajs at anvilwalrusden.com<mailto:ajs at anvilwalrusden.com>
_______________________________________________
gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_listinfo_gnso-2Drds-2Dpdp-2Dwg&d=DwMFaQ&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=r-Nirn4kOYGkwbVx0VsP9wXIoGGzhrrchbSexWZfRoA&m=iVLK34TBKeI7rv7cV8VAGiUyIne73-fkIvNIuRpTNZs&s=VK73sP1N2Kkzm0OvCP49V10JpXBCOSRJTBHb7sWq198&e=>





_______________________________________________

gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list

gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>

https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_listinfo_gnso-2Drds-2Dpdp-2Dwg&d=DwMFaQ&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=r-Nirn4kOYGkwbVx0VsP9wXIoGGzhrrchbSexWZfRoA&m=iVLK34TBKeI7rv7cV8VAGiUyIne73-fkIvNIuRpTNZs&s=VK73sP1N2Kkzm0OvCP49V10JpXBCOSRJTBHb7sWq198&e=>


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20180419/1e15cf35/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 221 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20180419/1e15cf35/image001-0001.png>


More information about the gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list