[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] IMPORTANT: Invitation for Poll from 24 January Meeting
Andrew Sullivan
ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
Sun Jan 28 00:30:15 UTC 2018
Dear colleagues,
I did not manage to complete this questionnaire in time. I also have
not listened to all the discussion from the other day, so you ought to
discount my views to the extent that discussion pertains.
I confess that I find the form baroque and confusing. Nevertheless,
to the extent I understand it I think I understand the options, here
is what I believe:
On 2, I think that a, c, d, and f are good criteria; e is possible. I
don't know what (b) would be that isn't (c) (i.e. I think if b does
not entail c then the contracts are wrong and need to be fixed). I
haven't any idea what e is, really, so I can't comment. So this
answer to q2 would be (c).
On 3, I nevertheless think that all of the purposes satisfy some
criterion I think ok, so I think they're all legit. I would answer
3.a
Best regards,
A
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 08:00:54AM -0700, Lisa Phifer wrote:
> Dear all,
>
>
>
> In follow-up to this week's WG meeting, all RDS PDP WG Members are
> encouraged to participate in the following poll:
>
>
>
> https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/LQC2YJH
>
>
>
> Responses should be submitted through the above URL. For offline reference,
> a PDF of poll questions can also be found at:
>
>
>
>
> https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/74580038/Poll-from-24Januar
> y-Call.pdf
>
>
>
> This poll will close at COB Saturday 27 January.
>
>
>
> Please note that you must be a WG Member to participate in polls. If you are
> a WG Observer wishing to participate in polls, you must first contact
> gnso-secs at icann.org to upgrade to WG Member.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Lisa
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
--
Andrew Sullivan
ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
More information about the gnso-rds-pdp-wg
mailing list