[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] The message to the community (was Re: Cancellation of RDS PDP WG meetings at ICANN62)
Rubens Kuhl
rubensk at nic.br
Mon May 14 02:06:23 UTC 2018
> On 13 May 2018, at 21:54, Andrew Sullivan <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 01:00:29AM -0300, Rubens Kuhl wrote:
>>
>> Even saying so would require a consensus of the WG.
>
> Nonsense. The leadership can say whatever they want "in their
> judgement" about the WG.
That still doesn't constitute a WG position. It's basically their individual positions.
> If that's not true, I don't understand what
> the meaning of the term "the leadership" is.
In GNSO practices, shepherding instead of ruling.
>
> Still, I would like to propose something more radical: that the WG
> actually does produce such a rough consensus.
In GNSO lingo, consensus is what would be called rough consensus in IETF.
Rubens
>
> A
>
>
> --
> Andrew Sullivan
> ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 529 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20180513/eca669bd/signature.asc>
More information about the gnso-rds-pdp-wg
mailing list