<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
I agree with Jim, Marc and Steve that in the future greater clarity
is necessary regarding such polls. However, I certainly support the
current configuration and am grateful for their forbearance in
agreeing to move forward. And thanks to all who came forward as
leadership candidates.<br>
stephanie perrin<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2016-02-09 14:53, Metalitz, Steven
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:E5B4A2ED43DFAE4F9E710FA54FEF8F623F6ED996@LAEX02.MSK.local"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=windows-1252">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered
medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:SimSun;
panose-1:2 1 6 0 3 1 1 1 1 1;}
@font-face
{font-family:SimSun;
panose-1:2 1 6 0 3 1 1 1 1 1;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"\@SimSun";
panose-1:2 1 6 0 3 1 1 1 1 1;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">I
agree with Marc and Jim and would note that the e-mail
providing the link to the candidate poll stated “
endorsement is not a binding vote – it is simply an
indication of support.”<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">I
also think the consensus reached on the call was limited to
Chuck’s leadership role. However, since Chuck has
indicated that he supports having a leadership team
consisting of the “top 4” from the poll, I am certainly
comfortable supporting that. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Steve
Metalitz
<br>
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF
1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">From:</span></b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org">gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org</a>
[<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org">mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org</a>]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Anderson, Marc<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, February 09, 2016 1:48 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> James Galvin; <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org">gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] RDS PDP WG
Leadership Team - Deadline for objections Wed 10 Feb at
18.00 UTC<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I agree with Jim on all points.<br>
<br>
I'm not objecting as I feel comfortable that a leadership team
with Chuck as chair supported by Susan, Michele and David in a
configuration that they will propose to the rest of the
working group will do an excellent job. I also recognize and
agree with the point made on today's call that we need to
select a leadership team and move forward.<br>
<br>
I do want to echo Jim's point about the purpose of the pole.
It seemed to me that the pole was created in response to the
volume of email created by people "seconding" candidates
applying for leadership positions. Like Jim I did not
participate in the candidate support poll but did participate
in the leadership characteristics poll. I certainly would have
participated in the candidate poll had I know it would be used
in this manner. I don't think it's necessary to re-open to
poll.<br>
<br>
While Chuck as chair isn't one of them, this PDP will be
dealing with a number of contentious items and it's essential
that we are clear in what we are asking and communicating
going forward.<br>
<br>
Thank you,<br>
Marc<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
-----Original Message-----<br>
From: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org">gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org</a>
[<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org">mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org</a>]
On Behalf Of James Galvin<br>
Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2016 1:24 PM<br>
To: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org">gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org</a><br>
Subject: Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] RDS PDP WG Leadership Team -
Deadline for objections Wed 10 Feb at 18.00 UTC<br>
<br>
This is not an objection but I do want to repeat the comment I
made during the meeting we just had.<br>
<br>
First, I’m not objecting because I appreciate that we operate
with a consensus driven process and this call for any
objections is a tool in that process.<br>
<br>
However, the concern I stated during the meeting is that when
the poll was created it was never clearly stated that it was
going to be used as a consensus judging tool to select the
leadership.<br>
<br>
Less than 1 third of the working group members responded to
the opportunity to indicate support for leadership candidates
while almost 2 thirds responded to the opportunity to identify
desirable characteristics. If you just look at the numbers
clearly the “top 4” could change dramatically if more people
had participated in the poll, and I have to believe that more
would have participated if they had known it would be
important to do so.<br>
<br>
In the interest of full disclosure, I did not participate in
the candidate support poll while I did participate in the
leadership characteristics poll.<br>
<br>
It is essential that “formal questions” be clearly stated as
such so that working group members have an opportunity to
fully evaluate the consequences of their actions (or
non-actions).<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
<br>
Jim<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
On 9 Feb 2016, at 12:42, Marika Konings wrote:<br>
<br>
> Dear All,<br>
><br>
> Those on the RDS PDP WG call today, agreed to confirm
Chuck Gomes as <br>
> Chair of the RDS PDP WG.<br>
><br>
> It was also agreed that WG members should be given an
opportunity to <br>
> indicate any concerns you may have with moving forward
with the top <br>
> four candidates that were identified in the poll, namely
Chuck Gomes, <br>
> Susan Kawaguchi, Michele Neylon and David Cake (see<br>
> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-STDRVQ3Q/%29">https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-STDRVQ3Q/)</a>
as the leadership
<br>
> team of the RDS PDP WG, with the leadership team tasked
to organise <br>
> themselves in the form of chair/vice-chairs or co-chairs.<br>
><br>
> If you have any objections to this approach, please make
your <br>
> objection know on the mailing list by Wednesday 10
February at 18.00 <br>
> UTC as a desire was expressed on the call to move forward
with the <br>
> normal course of business as soon as possible.<br>
><br>
> Thanks,<br>
><br>
> Marika<br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list<br>
> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org">gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org</a><br>
> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg</a><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org">gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org</a><br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg</a><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org">gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org</a><br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg</a><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org">gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg</a></pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>