<div dir="ltr">Hi Stephanie,<div><br></div><div>To your first email - is the attached document the one you were looking for?</div><div><br>Best wishes,</div><div><br>Ayden</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 2:09 AM, Stephanie Perrin <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:stephanie.perrin@mail.utoronto.ca" target="_blank">stephanie.perrin@mail.utoronto.ca</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
Thanks very much for these materials Lisa. Please let me reiterate
a point that I guess has not registered yet. The first question we
have to ask is "what is the purpose of collecting, using, storing,
and disclosing registration data? If we agree on the narrow
definition that was defined in the 2007 WHOIS task force report,
then many of the current uses, as has been pointed out by the global
data commissioners repeatedly, are not legitimate. So lets agree on
the purpose of data collection first. I am deeply concerned about
the discussion of "requirements". Here is the 2007 definition:<br>
<em>The
GNSO Council recommends that the WHOIS task force use the
following definition:
"The purpose of the gTLD WHOIS service is to provide information
sufficient to contact a responsible party for a particular gTLD
domain name who
can resolve, or reliably pass on data to a party who can resolve,
issues
related to the configuration of the records associated with the
domain name
within a DNS name server." as a working definition to allow the
task force
to proceed on terms of reference (2), (3), and (4)<br>
<br>
</em>Note: the ICANN wiki says this is what we are doing:<br>
"
The <b>Next-Generation gTLD Registration Directory Services to
Replace Whois Policy Development Process Working Group</b>
(RDS-PDP-WG) has been established to redefine the purpose of gTLD
registration data and to consider how to safeguard this data. It is
also tasked with proposing a model for gTLD registration directory
services that will address accuracy, privacy, and access issues.
"<br>
If we are redefining the purpose of gTLD registration data, we
should address that question first.<br>
cheers Stephanie<span class=""><br>
<br>
<div>On 2016-03-19 11:18, Lisa Phifer wrote:<br>
</div>
</span><blockquote type="cite"><div><div class="h5">
Greetings all,<br>
<br>
Attached please find materials developed by the leadership team to
facilitate discussion during the next WG call. These materials
include:<br>
<br>
(1) <u>A summary table of all work plan changes proposed thus
far.</u>
This serves as a consolidated record of all suggestions made to
date
during WG calls, meetings, and on the email list. Staff will
continue to
add any new suggestions made between now and the next WG call as
new rows
to the end of this table. This table is a tool to help all WG
members
easily recall and consider all of the suggestions made by
everyone,
before attempting to agree upon resolutions. In creating this
table, we
tried to extract and accurately paraphrase changes and rationale
from
lengthier email exchanges, but the WG's email archive
(<a href="http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/" target="_blank">
http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg</a>) can be
consulted for
all email message text in full. Italicized "Notes" have also
been included to provide linkage between suggestions and related
charter
questions.<br>
<br>
(2) <u>A mind map of fundamental questions and sub-questions.</u>
This
serves as a concise illustration of the fundamental questions and
sub-questions detailed in the Issue Report and Charter. This map
can be
adjusted as the WG agrees upon refinements to questions (including
but
not limited to sequencing) and adds new subquestions,
inter-dependencies,
further inputs, and detailed policies that should be "parked"
for consideration during phases 2/3. This map is a tool to help
the WG
better understand and reach agreement on fundamental questions to
be
addressed in phase 1 by providing an overall picture as well as an
opportunity to start thinking about additional sub-questions and
whether
there are certain questions that need to be considered before
being able
to address other questions, etc.<br>
<br>
(3) <u>A simple text listing of the questions and sub-questions
in the
mind map</u> - for those who may find a simple bullet list of
questions
in text format more useful than a mind map.<br>
<br>
We hope that the WG will find these materials to be a helpful
starting
point to facilitate further WG discussion on the phase 1 work
plan.
<br>
<br>
In addition, the leadership team is working on an annotated draft
of the
work plan itself, to be distributed on Monday for use during
Tuesday's
RDS PDP WG call.<br>
<br>
Best Regards,<br>
Lisa<br>
<br>
<br>
<fieldset></fieldset>
<br>
</div></div><span class=""><pre>_______________________________________________
gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
<a href="mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org" target="_blank">gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org</a>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg</a></pre>
</span></blockquote>
<br>
</div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org">gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg</a><br></blockquote></div><br></div>