<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <p><font size="+1"><font face="Lucida Grande">Indeed, I agree whole
          heartedly.  Registrars may collect what they need to do
          business, and are governed by relevant data protection law. 
          However, what they collect, use, disclose, escrow, and retain
          as instructed by ICANN is clearly within our remit, and unless
          I am mistaken there is a certain crossover in the matter of
          data retention....if the registrars over collect metadata,
          they are instructed to retain it in the RAA so this may be an
          instance where we ought to be looking over their shoulders. 
          The key question, from a data protection perspective is do
          they have a legitimate interest, as data controller, in
          collecting, using and disclosing it.  The same applies to
          ICANN as data controller:  do they have a legitimate interest
          in demanding through contract, as the data controller for the
          purposes of mandating data collection, use and disclosure as a
          condition of accreditation, the data listed in the RAA?  And
          it is ICANN which concerns us.</font></font></p>
    <p><font size="+1"><font face="Lucida Grande">Stephanie</font></font><br>
    </p>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2016-05-09 20:49, Carlton Samuels
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CAOZQb9TNPYJ9LbzT8xrYBfjocSdDXmFv5kLmqdesfgss8YDVpw@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
        charset=windows-1252">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:comic sans
          ms,sans-serif;font-size:small">Exactly!   And we have a
          listing of the elements right there in the RAA.</div>
        <div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:comic sans
          ms,sans-serif;font-size:small"><br>
        </div>
        <div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:comic sans
          ms,sans-serif;font-size:small">This distinction has been made
          again and again in every fora I have attended on registration
          data. And all arguments/traige/decisions pertaining
          purposefulness, access and privacy pertain ONLY to those
          elements. </div>
        <div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:comic sans
          ms,sans-serif;font-size:small"><br>
        </div>
        <div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:comic sans
          ms,sans-serif;font-size:small">-Carlton</div>
      </div>
      <div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all">
        <div>
          <div class="gmail_signature"><br>
            ==============================<br>
            Carlton A Samuels<br>
            Mobile: 876-818-1799<br>
            <i><font color="#33CC00">Strategy, Planning, Governance,
                Assessment &amp; Turnaround</font></i><br>
            =============================</div>
        </div>
        <br>
        <div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 12:41 AM, Alan
          Greenberg <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca" target="_blank">alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca</a>&gt;</span>
          wrote:<br>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
            .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">One small
            (but I think important) issue that has been bothering me
            since we started this WG.<br>
            <br>
            When we talk about what data is being collected by
            registrars or registries, I think we need to be very careful
            in our wording. What we are interested in is what data is
            being collected (or should be collected in the future)
            MANDATED by ICANN agreements. What they collect on their own
            volition is not on our agenda (whether it is credit card
            information, your birth date so they can send you a
            gratuitous Happy Birthday wish, or your national identity
            number).<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
                <br>
                Alan</font></span>
            <div class="HOEnZb">
              <div class="h5"><br>
                <br>
                At 09/05/2016 12:12 AM, Kathy Kleiman wrote:<br>
                <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
                  .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
                  Hi Chuck, Michele, Susan, David, and Lisa,<br>
                  I think Holly has hit the nail on the head. At the
                  outset, and before moving forward to any additional
                  questions, we should evaluate:<br>
                  1) what data is collected?<br>
                  2) why is this data collected?<br>
                  3) is this data the subject of data protection laws?<br>
                  <br>
                  This is exactly the foundation and background that the
                  subgroups have prepared for us - the Data Elements,
                  Privacy law and Purpose subgroups. We now have the
                  materials to enter into this analysis as a full WG in
                  a constructive, informed and systematic way.<br>
                  <br>
                  Marika recently shared these questions in the link she
                  sent around summarizing our previous comments/
                  suggestions. Members from a range of SOs and ACs
                  raised the need for the WG to reorder the questions to
                  allow consideration of data elements, privacy
                  frameworks and "purpose" upfront and early on. As you
                  may remember, Scott Hollenbeck kicked off the
                  discussion and many others joined in. <a
                    moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/58730879/RDS-PDP-Phase1-ProposedWorkPlanChanges-16March2016.pdf"
                    rel="noreferrer" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/58730879/RDS-PDP-Phase1-ProposedWorkPlanChanges-16March2016.pdf">https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/58730879/RDS-PDP-Phase1-ProposedWorkPlanChanges-16March2016.pdf</a></a>.
                  When we checked with members of Charter Team in
                  Marrakech, they blessed the idea that we as a WG
                  should choose our own order for the questions - as
                  long as we cover them all, they would be happy.<br>
                  <br>
                  Accordingly, why would we launch into secondary
                  purposes first? Rephrased, why would we consider all
                  of the "possible requirements" of a directory service
                  when we as a WG have not yet undertaken the basic
                  analysis of what data is collected, for what primary
                  purpose, and under what privacy laws and frameworks we
                  should be analyzing the data?  This seems totally like
                  putting the cart before the horse.<br>
                  <br>
                  Best,<br>
                  Kathy<br>
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  On 5/7/2016 4:22 PM, Holly Raiche wrote:<br>
                  <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
                    .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
                    Thanks Lisa<br>
                    <br>
                    What the data group has  been exploring is just what
                    data is actually collected by registries/registrars.<br>
                    <br>
                    I realise that the original Charter questions were
                    framed around gTLD registration data - the 'Whois'
                    data that must be made public under the 2013 RAA. 
                    But what the data group has identified is that there
                    is more data in question than just the 'Whois' data.
                    Yet these questions are framed around the gTLD data.<br>
                    <br>
                    Somewhere, there should be a question - or something
                    - that suggests that the Charter questions should go
                    further to at least consider what data is collected
                    and why, and whether it should be the subject of
                    data protections.<br>
                    <br>
                    Thanks<br>
                    <br>
                    Holly<br>
                    <br>
                    <br>
                    On 8 May 2016, at 2:57 am, Lisa Phifer &lt;<a
                      moz-do-not-send="true"
                      href="mailto:lisa@corecom.com" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:lisa@corecom.com">lisa@corecom.com</a></a>&gt;
                    wrote:<br>
                    <br>
                    <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
                      .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
                      Dear all,<br>
                      <br>
                      A reminder that PDP WG feedback if any on the
                      attached early outreach message is due no later
                      than tomorrow - Sunday 8 May 23.59 UTC.<br>
                      <br>
                      Best, Lisa<br>
                      <br>
                      At 12:07 PM 5/3/2016, Lisa Phifer wrote:<br>
                      <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0
                        0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc
                        solid;padding-left:1ex">
                        Dear all,<br>
                        <br>
                        As agreed during today's WG call, attached
                        please find a slightly revised draft input
                        template to solicit early input from ICANN
                        SOs/ACs and GNSO SG/Cs. This is the template
                        discussed in today's WG call.<br>
                        <br>
                        Remember, there will be many opportunities for
                        community input throughout this PDP. The
                        attached input template is to be used to
                        initiate the early outreach required of every
                        PDP to inform the WG at the start of its work.
                        The template is a tool used successfully by
                        other PDP WG's to solicit structured input,
                        along with any additional input each group
                        wishes to provide.<br>
                        <br>
                        WG member feedback on this draft input template
                        is welcome: please send any feedback to the
                        entire WG list &lt;<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                          href="mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org"
                          target="_blank">gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org</a>&gt;
                        no later than Sunday 8 May 23.59 UTC.<br>
                        <br>
                        Our goal is to send the final version of this
                        template to initiate early outreach next week.<br>
                        <br>
                        Best, Lisa<br>
                        <br>
                        <br>
                        _______________________________________________<br>
                        gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list<br>
                        <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                          href="mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org"
                          target="_blank">gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org</a><br>
                        <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                          href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg"
                          rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg</a><br>
                      </blockquote>
                      &lt;RDS PDP - SO AC SG C Input Template - 2 May
                      2016
                      rev.pdf&gt;_______________________________________________<br>
                      gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list<br>
                      <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org"
                        target="_blank">gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org</a><br>
                      <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg"
                        rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg</a><br>
                    </blockquote>
                    _______________________________________________<br>
                    gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list<br>
                    <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                      href="mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org"
                      target="_blank">gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org</a><br>
                    <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                      href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg"
                      rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg</a><br>
                  </blockquote>
                  <br>
                  _______________________________________________<br>
                  gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list<br>
                  <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org"
                    target="_blank">gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org</a><br>
                  <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg"
                    rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg</a><br>
                </blockquote>
                <br>
                _______________________________________________<br>
                gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list<br>
                <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org"
                  target="_blank">gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org</a><br>
                <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg"
                  rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg</a><br>
              </div>
            </div>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
        <br>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org">gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg</a></pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>