<p dir="ltr">Morning Lisa,</p>
<p dir="ltr">No comment. </p>
<div class="gmail_quote">Le 11 mai 2016 04:37, "Lisa Phifer" <<a href="mailto:lisa@corecom.com">lisa@corecom.com</a>> a écrit :<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div>
Dear all,<br><br>
Attached please find an updated draft of the RDS PDP WG Phase 1 Work Plan
for WG approval.<br><br>
Change marks in this update reflect edits to address feedback (below)
from today's WG call.<br><br>
During today's WG call, WG members on the call approved publishing this
work plan, with the understanding that work plan details are dynamic and
will continue to evolve.<br><br>
<b>As indicated in Action Item #3 below, WG members not on today's call
are now asked to review this work plan and raise any serious objections
to this email list by COB Friday 13 May.<br><br>
</b>If no serious objections are raised, this work plan will be published
on the WG's wiki. The WG will then continue on to the next tasks
identified in this work plan.<br><br>
Best regards,<br>
Lisa<br><br>
<br>
At 11:50 AM 5/10/2016, Marika Konings wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite"><b><i>3. Discuss updated Phase 1
Work Plan - RDS PDP WG </i></b>
<ul>
<li>See latest draft distributed on the mailing list (dated 5 May)
<li>Adjust date for 7e based on actual circulation date of SO/AC/SG/C
outreach message
<li>Item 8 - any and all requirements could be identified here, does not
only need to relate to purpose. Possible list of requirements, no
substance or analysis yet - will happen as part of the deliberations.
<li>How to avoid mixing process with substances?
<li>Helsinki meeting could be used to get input from others, also should
additional materials and/or webinars be prepared to facilitate the
preparation of SO/AC/SG/Cs
<li>Are the timeframes realistic for item 8c - what is expected from the
WG? At this stage, the WG is not asked to express their opinion on the
requirements on the list, but only to add any that are missing which will
be added without discussion. Following that, the document will be
reviewed for possible duplication and re-grouping.
<li>Need to differentiate between what Registrars collect as part of
their business practices and what ICANN requires Registrars to collect
them as part of accreditation and contractual requirements. This makes
ICANN a data controller according to some. Others note that the people or
bodies that collect and manage personal data are called 'data
controllers'.
<li>The list is POSSIBLE requirements - whether they will become
requirements will be determined by the WG after deliberation.
<li>Step 9 to be refined after step 8 - will need to determine whether
further outreach will be needed and in what form. Need to update dates as
the current ones are not realistic.
<li>Leadership team will aim to keep the WG moving forward, but cannot
overrush it either.
<li>Update in step 13 reference to 12e, not 12d
<li>Is there anything in this work plan that anyone seriously objects to?
Is this work plan, understanding that it is dynamic and it will change,
sufficiently good enough for the WG to consider it final and for the
community to see? Note, dates will be updated as concerns have been
expressed in relation to some of the dates that do not reflect the
current timeline. No objecctions expressed by those on the call - draft
work plan considered good enough to move forward.
</li></li></li></li></li></li></li></li></li></li></li></li></ul><b>Action item #2</b> - make sure that dates in work plan are
realistic (see for example item 9, item 10)<br>
<b>Action item #3</b> - Those that were not able to attend the meeting
are requested to provide their input on is there anything in this work
plan that anyone seriously objects to? Is this work plan, understanding
that it is dynamic and it will change, sufficiently good enough for the
WG to consider it final and for the community to see? Deadline: by the
end of this week (Friday COB wherever you are).</blockquote></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org">gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg</a><br></blockquote></div>