<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <p>I am with Greg on this one. There are dark corners in the world
      of trademarks and trademark litigation, but this is not one of
      them.</p>
    <p>On both a lighter and more substantial side one can check out the
      Electric Frontier Foundation (EFF) "<i>Stupid Patent AND Trademark
        of the Month</i>" offerings,  <br>
    </p>
    <p>and their latest offering around "My Health" at <a
href="https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2016/05/stupid-patent-and-trademark-month-my-healthr"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2016/05/stupid-patent-and-trademark-month-my-healthr">https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2016/05/stupid-patent-and-trademark-month-my-healthr</a></a></p>
    Sam L.<br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
      <font size="-1"><i>On 6/11/2016 2:24 AM, Greg Shatan wrote:</i><i><br>
        </i></font></div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CA+aOHUSWX0T9RbxdRgnQ8xQHdSPf27_mL-FcOeW2WO_26-JHtQ@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite"><font size="-1"><i>Nothing in the reported
          case prevents anyone from saying Thank You or Thanks. 
          Implying otherwise is unhelpful.</i><i><span></span></i><i><br>
        </i><i><br>
        </i><i>On Saturday, June 11, 2016, Stephanie Perrin &lt;</i><i><a
            moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="mailto:stephanie.perrin@mail.utoronto.ca"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:stephanie.perrin@mail.utoronto.ca">stephanie.perrin@mail.utoronto.ca</a></a></i><i>&gt;
          wrote:</i><i><br>
        </i></font>
      <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
        .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><font
          size="-1"><i> </i></font>
        <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"><font size="-1"><i> </i></font>
          <p><font size="-1"><i><font face="Lucida Grande">I am with
                  Carleton on this one.  Everybody should be allowed to
                  say thanks.  not enough of it around....</font></i></font></p>
          <font size="-1"><i> </i></font>
          <p><font size="-1"><i><font face="Lucida Grande">Stephanie
                  Perrin<br>
                </font></i></font></p>
          <font size="-1"><i> </i></font>
          <p><font size="-1"><i><br>
              </i></font> </p>
          <font size="-1"><i> </i><i><br>
            </i><i> </i></font>
          <div><font size="-1"><i>On 2016-06-10 21:13, Carlton Samuels
                wrote:</i><i><br>
              </i></font> </div>
          <font size="-1"><i> </i></font>
          <blockquote type="cite"><font size="-1"><i> Greg: </i></font>
            <div><font size="-1"><i>I hold no brief for Reuters. I
                  looked at the PTO database and saw all you said. And
                  quite frankly if I were an IP lawyer in the trenches
                  and on the clock,  I probably would be encouraging
                  these fellas to fight.</i></font></div>
            <font size="-1"><i> </i></font>
            <div><font size="-1"><i><br>
                </i></font> </div>
            <font size="-1"><i> </i></font>
            <div><font size="-1"><i>All that aside, howsoever you slice
                  or dice it, granting exclusive commercial rights to
                  [qualified] "thanks" or "thankyou" seems over the top.</i></font></div>
            <font size="-1"><i> </i></font>
            <div><font size="-1"><i><br>
                </i></font> </div>
            <font size="-1"><i> </i></font>
            <div><font size="-1"><i>Carlton</i></font></div>
            <font size="-1"><i> </i></font>
            <div><font size="-1"><i><br>
                </i></font> </div>
            <font size="-1"><i> </i></font>
            <div><font size="-1"><i><br>
                </i><i> </i><i><br>
                </i><i> </i></font>
              <div class="gmail_quote"><font size="-1"><i> </i></font>
                <div dir="ltr"><font size="-1"><i>On Fri, Jun 10, 2016,
                      5:13 PM Greg Shatan &lt;</i><i><a
                        moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','gregshatanipc@gmail.com');"
                        target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com">gregshatanipc@gmail.com</a></a></i><i>&gt;
                      wrote:</i><i><br>
                    </i></font> </div>
                <font size="-1"><i> </i></font>
                <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
                  .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><font
                    size="-1"><i> </i></font>
                  <div dir="ltr">
                    <div class="gmail_default"
                      style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><font
                        size="-1"><i>Not sure anyone needs to be tarred
                          and feathered here.  But let's get the facts
                          straight. (Perhaps those who don't get the
                          facts straight are the ones who should be
                          tarred &amp; feathered, etc., but that seems
                          rather harsh.  I prefer to educate rather than
                          vilify.)</i></font></div>
                    <div class="gmail_default"
                      style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><font
                        size="-1"><i><br>
                        </i></font> </div>
                    <div class="gmail_default"
                      style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><font
                        size="-1"><i>Citi did not sue AT&amp;T for
                          "using the word in a commercial." Citi sued
                          AT&amp;T for apparently seeking to brand its
                          new customer loyalty program as AT&amp;T
                          THANKS when Citibank already has a
                          longstanding (since 2004) customer loyalty
                          program branded as CITI THANK YOU, with about
                          15 million members in the US, and a trademark
                          registered since 2011 for "</i><i><font
                            color="#ff0000"><span
                              style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px">Promoting
                              the goods and services of others through
                              administration of incentive reward and
                              redemption programs by distributing
                              rewards for credit and debit card use, and
                              for banking and wealth management
                              customer </span><b
                              style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px">loyalty</b></font></i><i>". 
                          And AT&amp;T didn't merely use the THANKS
                          brand, they applied for a trademark
                          registration for AT&amp;T THANKS for "</i><i><span>Providing
                            incentive award programs for customers for
                            the purpose of promoting and rewarding
                            loyalty.</span></i><i>"  </i></font></div>
                    <div class="gmail_default"
                      style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><font
                        size="-1"><i><br>
                        </i></font> </div>
                    <div class="gmail_default"
                      style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><font
                        size="-1"><i>It seems like an entirely
                          reasonable claim that consumers could be
                          confused between a THANK YOU brand loyalty
                          program and a THANKS brand loyalty program. 
                          Without opining on the likelihood of success,
                          it's an entirely reasonable claim of
                          infringement.  Indeed the subject matter of
                          this email demonstrates such confusion --
                          THANKS is not "trademarked" by anyone, in
                          spite of the attention-getting headline.  CITI
                          THANK YOU is a registered trademark of
                          Citigroup.  AT&amp;T THANKS is the subject of
                          a pending application by AT&amp;T.</i></font></div>
                    <div class="gmail_default"
                      style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><font
                        size="-1"><i><br>
                        </i></font> </div>
                    <div class="gmail_default"
                      style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><font
                        size="-1"><i>If AT&amp;T had merely "used the
                          word in a commercial" and not as a trademark,
                          there would be nothing to object to, and no
                          claim, and this email wouldn't exist.  The
                          actual facts are significantly different.  </i></font></div>
                    <div class="gmail_default"
                      style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><font
                        size="-1"><i><br>
                        </i></font> </div>
                    <div class="gmail_default"
                      style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><font
                        size="-1"><i>That's the problem with suggesting
                          tarring and feathering, and other such actions
                          of a mob mentality.  They are based on
                          incorrect facts and a desire to inflame
                          people, rather than to inform them. 
                          Unfortunately, information can come too late
                          to save the victims of such an attack (hot tar
                          causes serious and often fatal burns). 
                          Thankfully, all that was suggested was a
                          rhetorical tarring and feathering, so no one
                          actually suffered at the hands of an
                          ill-informed, intemperate mob.</i></font></div>
                    <div class="gmail_default"
                      style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><font
                        size="-1"><i><br>
                        </i></font> </div>
                    <div class="gmail_default"
                      style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><font
                        size="-1"><i>Hope that is informative.</i></font></div>
                    <div class="gmail_default"
                      style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><font
                        size="-1"><i><br>
                        </i></font> </div>
                    <div class="gmail_default"
                      style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><font
                        size="-1"><i>Greg</i></font></div>
                    <div class="gmail_default"
                      style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><font
                        size="-1"><i><br>
                        </i></font> </div>
                    <div class="gmail_default"
                      style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><font
                        size="-1"><i>[Caveats: (1) I am a CITI THANK YOU
                          cardholder and use my THANK YOU points
                          regularly on Amazon where they are available
                          as dollars. (2) From around 1999 to 2004, the
                          firm I was with represented Citigroup in
                          trademark matters, though I personally didn't
                          do very much of that work.  I have not had any
                          professional relationship with Citigroup since
                          2004 (3) This should not be construed as legal
                          advice.] </i></font></div>
                  </div>
                  <font size="-1"><i> </i></font>
                  <div class="gmail_extra"><font size="-1"><i><br>
                      </i></font> </div>
                  <font size="-1"><i> </i></font>
                  <div class="gmail_extra">
                    <div class="gmail_quote"><font size="-1"><i>On Fri,
                          Jun 10, 2016 at 3:15 PM, Carlton Samuels </i><i><span
                            dir="ltr">&lt;<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                              href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','carlton.samuels@gmail.com');"
                              target="_blank">carlton.samuels@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span></i><i>
                          wrote:</i><i><br>
                        </i></font> </div>
                  </div>
                  <font size="-1"><i> </i></font>
                  <div class="gmail_extra"><font size="-1"><i> </i></font>
                    <div class="gmail_quote"><font size="-1"><i> </i></font>
                      <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0
                        0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc
                        solid;padding-left:1ex"><font size="-1"><i> </i></font>
                        <div dir="ltr"><font size="-1"><i> </i></font>
                          <div class="gmail_default"><font size="-1"><i>..and
                                Citi sues AT&amp;T for using  the word
                                in a commercial!  It also owns </i><i><a
                                  moz-do-not-send="true"
                                  href="http://thankyou.com"
                                  target="_blank">thankyou.com</a></i><i>
                                as well! </i></font></div>
                          <font size="-1"><i> </i></font>
                          <div class="gmail_default"><font size="-1"><i><br>
                              </i></font> </div>
                          <font size="-1"><i> </i></font>
                          <div class="gmail_default"><font size="-1"><i>I
                                checked the USPTO database and it was a
                                revelation; lots of "thankyou" there,
                                dead and alive. See:  </i><i><a
                                  moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/gate.exe?f=searchss&amp;state=4803:ku1j42.1.1"
                                  target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/gate.exe?f=searchss&amp;state=4803:ku1j42.1.1">http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/gate.exe?f=searchss&amp;state=4803:ku1j42.1.1</a></a></i></font></div>
                          <font size="-1"><i> </i></font>
                          <div class="gmail_default"><font size="-1"><i><br>
                              </i></font> </div>
                          <font size="-1"><i> </i></font>
                          <div class="gmail_default"><font size="-1"><i>So
                                I ask you, who're the halfwits that need
                                to be tarred, feathered and put in stock
                                in the village square for a quick kick
                                in the butt from every passerby?</i></font></div>
                          <font size="-1"><i> </i></font>
                          <div class="gmail_default"><font size="-1"><i><br>
                              </i></font> </div>
                          <font size="-1"><i> </i></font>
                          <div class="gmail_default"><font size="-1"><i><font
                                  face="comic sans ms, sans-serif"><a
                                    moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.reuters.com/article/us-at-t-citigroup-lawsuit-idUSKCN0YW1K3"
                                    target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/us-at-t-citigroup-lawsuit-idUSKCN0YW1K3">http://www.reuters.com/article/us-at-t-citigroup-lawsuit-idUSKCN0YW1K3</a></a></font></i><i><br>
                              </i></font> </div>
                          <font size="-1"><i> </i></font>
                          <div class="gmail_default"><font size="-1"><i><font
                                  face="comic sans ms, sans-serif"><br>
                                </font></i></font></div>
                          <font size="-1"><i> </i></font>
                          <div class="gmail_default"><font size="-1"><i><font
                                  face="comic sans ms, sans-serif">-Carlton</font></i></font></div>
                          <font size="-1"><i> </i></font>
                          <div class="gmail_default"><font size="-1"><i><font
                                  face="comic sans ms, sans-serif"><br>
                                </font></i></font></div>
                          <font size="-1"><i> </i></font>
                          <div class="gmail_default"><font size="-1"><i><font
                                  face="comic sans ms, sans-serif">[Disclosure:
                                  I'm partial to AT&amp;T on account
                                  they paid for graduate school.]</font></i></font></div>
                          <font size="-1"><i> </i></font>
                          <div class="gmail_default"><font size="-1"><i><font
                                  face="comic sans ms, sans-serif"><br>
                                </font></i></font></div>
                          <font size="-1"><i> </i></font>
                          <div class="gmail_default"><font size="-1"><i>==============================</i><i><br>
                              </i></font> </div>
                          <font size="-1"><i> </i></font>
                          <div><font size="-1"><i> </i></font>
                            <div data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><font
                                size="-1"><i>Carlton A Samuels</i><i><br>
                                </i><i> Mobile: </i><i><a
                                    moz-do-not-send="true"
                                    href="tel:876-818-1799"
                                    value="+18768181799" target="_blank">876-818-1799</a></i><i><br>
                                </i><i> </i><i><font color="#33CC00">Strategy,
                                    Planning, Governance, Assessment
                                    &amp; Turnaround</font></i></font><br>
                              =============================</div>
                          </div>
                        </div>
                        <br>
                      </blockquote>
                    </div>
                  </div>
                  <div class="gmail_extra">
                    <div class="gmail_quote">
                      <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0
                        0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc
                        solid;padding-left:1ex">_______________________________________________<br>
                        gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list<br>
                        <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                          href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org');"
                          target="_blank">gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org</a><br>
                        <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                          href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg"
                          rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg</a><br>
                      </blockquote>
                    </div>
                    <br>
                  </div>
                </blockquote>
              </div>
            </div>
            <br>
            <fieldset></fieldset>
            <br>
            <pre>_______________________________________________
gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org');" target="_blank">gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org</a>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg</a></pre>
          </blockquote>
          <br>
        </div>
      </blockquote>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org">gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg</a></pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
------------------------------------------------
"It is a disgrace to be rich and honoured
in an unjust state" -Confucius
 邦有道,贫且贱焉,耻也。邦无道,富且贵焉,耻也
------------------------------------------------
Dr Sam Lanfranco (Prof Emeritus &amp; Senior Scholar)
Econ, York U., Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - M3J 1P3
email: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Lanfran@Yorku.ca">Lanfran@Yorku.ca</a>   Skype: slanfranco
blog:  <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://samlanfranco.blogspot.com">http://samlanfranco.blogspot.com</a>
Phone: +1 613-476-0429 cell: +1 416-816-2852</pre>
  </body>
</html>