<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body dir="auto">
<div>Simple answer: no. We are getting ahead of the work plan as I have tried to say in several other messages. </div>
<div id="AppleMailSignature"><br>
</div>
<div id="AppleMailSignature">The dialog is good but not timely. If we allow this to happen we will lose a lot time because we will have to repeat all later and we will find ourselves jumping all over the place instead of focusing on where we need to focus at
the time. </div>
<div id="AppleMailSignature"><br>
</div>
<div id="AppleMailSignature">So I strongly request everyone to refrain. </div>
<div id="AppleMailSignature"><br>
</div>
<div id="AppleMailSignature">Chuck<br>
<br>
Sent from my iPhone</div>
<div><br>
On Jul 5, 2016, at 11:58 AM, DANIEL NANGHAKA <<a href="mailto:dndannang@gmail.com">dndannang@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">Dear All,
<div><br>
</div>
<div>It looks as though we have started the deliberation and getting in deep waters. Are we going according to the workplan?</div>
</div>
<div hspace="streak-pt-mark" style="max-height:1px"><img style="width:0px;max-height:0px;overflow:hidden" src="https://mailfoogae.appspot.com/t?sender=aZG5kYW5uYW5nQGdtYWlsLmNvbQ%3D%3D&type=zerocontent&guid=4b6d779d-e7cf-4bb1-814e-5c6ea71d6524"><font color="#ffffff" size="1">ᐧ</font></div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all">
<div>
<div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div> <br>
Regards <br>
Nanghaka Daniel K.<br>
Executive Director - ILICIT Africa / Council Member - FOSSFA / Community Lead - ISOC Uganda Chapter<br>
Mobile +256 772 898298 (Uganda)<br>
</div>
<div>Skype: daniel.nanghaka<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>----------------------------------------- <i><span>"Working for Africa" </span>
</i>-----------------------------------------<br>
<img src="https://docs.google.com/uc?export=download&id=0BwH7MatcY6gPOGxHaDhJMGZwN2c&revid=0BwH7MatcY6gPWmQyTXJIdWtScmN2ZUxpRDBpZG8wZUd5ZkhBPQ" height="87" width="87">
<img src="https://docs.google.com/uc?export=download&id=0BwH7MatcY6gPeFAxdFF3Skk4b3M&revid=0BwH7MatcY6gPK2MxMkFyME5BWS9hb0VQMFRmTVFTMlB2SENRPQ" height="73" width="278"><br>
<img src="https://docs.google.com/uc?export=download&id=0BwH7MatcY6gPSF9OWXFHYkV3ZVk&revid=0BwH7MatcY6gPcURiZC9meEU1cEJzaGk3TTBjOUE2NWNxSEg0PQ" height="86" width="436"><br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 6:51 PM, Farell Folly <span dir="ltr">
<<a href="mailto:farellfolly@gmail.com" target="_blank">farellfolly@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<p dir="ltr">I am afraid we are going in too much detail...too EARLY for that !</p>
<p dir="ltr">Best Regards<br>
<br>
</p>
<span class="im HOEnZb">
<p dir="ltr">Best Regards<br>
--ff--</p>
<p dir="ltr">Mail sent from my mobile phone. Excuse for brievety.</p>
</span>
<div class="HOEnZb">
<div class="h5">
<div class="gmail_quote">Le 5 juil. 2016 16:49, "Rob Golding" <<a href="mailto:rob.golding@astutium.com" target="_blank">rob.golding@astutium.com</a>> a écrit :<br type="attribution">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
registrar<br>
</blockquote>
Only in TLD that have a registry/registrar model. (And we are only<br>
concerned about gTLD in this WG, right?)<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Yes, as a WG we're essentially only concerned with gTLDs under ICANNs remit, so they all have a Registry/Registrar model (even if the Registrar on a brand-tld could be the Registry)<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
auth-code<br>
</blockquote>
Also note that this is not baked into DNS technology or anything like<br>
that, but is only an artifact of a current registrar transfer system.<br>
Fundamentally this is a way to authenticate the registrant, which is<br>
what the registry really needs.<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
It's less about authentication of the Registrant, and more about ensuring authorisation has been gained for the Transfer.<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
status<br>
</blockquote>
What does this mean?<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Domains are (currently) required to have "status" code(s) relating to locks, udrp etc - but on further reflection it's not absolutely necessary for the domain name to exist or function (although will be there "internally" at the Registry)<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
And for it to be of some "functional" use:<br>
Optional<br>
nameservers<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
And also optionally:<br>
DS record (or DNSKEY or other cryptographic information which can be<br>
used to produce a DS record for DNSSEC).<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Is the most-effective Denial-Of-Service methodology for domains actually needed for it to "work" though (leaving aside how many dont work because of dnssec) ? Probably.<br>
<br>
So ...<br>
<br>
To Exist =<br>
* domain-name (what it is)<br>
* registrar (who manages it)<br>
<br>
To Function [optional] =<br>
* nameservers<br>
* ds-stuff<br>
<br>
To Manage / Needed for Internal Systems =<br>
* transfer authentication [optional dependant on registration model]<br>
* expiry date<br>
* status<br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
As a final note, if there are no registrars then everything except for<br>
the expiry date can be obtained from the DNS itself.<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
In principle I agree - I'm sure we can argue the minutiae of detail about whether it needs to be somewhere else for DNS to work though<br>
<br>
Anyone else have items to add which are _required_ rather than one-or-more of wants/nice-to-have/needed-for-my-business-model etc ?<br>
<br>
<br>
Rob<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org" target="_blank">gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org">gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br>
<span>gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list</span><br>
<span><a href="mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org">gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org</a></span><br>
<span><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg</a></span><br>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>