<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<p>Dear Stephanie</p>
<p>Greetings and Thanks for your hard work. At this occasion may I
thank all in this group, staff or participants, who have put in so
much effort so far.</p>
<p> After reading Stephanies document and thinking it over, I think
this is a valuable approach which I like to support. One of the
important points is that even the "non-experts", will have to be
able to work with it and understand what is going on. There might
be some refinements possible that even more streamline the
approach and categories. <br>
</p>
<p>I urge my fellow group members to have a good look at what
Stephanie has produced and if possible support its adoption and
maybe suggest some further refinements.</p>
<p>Yours</p>
<p>Klaus<br>
</p>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 7/24/2016 10:50 PM, Stephanie Perrin
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:6ca50fb2-8a69-03fe-8be0-4322949aae1d@mail.utoronto.ca"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=windows-1252">
<p><font size="+1"><font face="Lucida Grande">As discussed in the
call last week (July 20th), I had some alternative thoughts
on the categories chosen to sort our triage spreadsheet,
while very much appreciating the amount of work Lisa and
Susan have already done on it. Chuck asked me if I could
come up with an alternative, as he did not want to slow down
to tinker with the categories, which everyone might select
differently. Accordingly, I have come up with what I hope
is a framework of categories that relies more on the type of
potential requirement (eg. function, technical, legal, etc)
rather than keywords. I have put almost all of the other
groups into what I think are the logical slots in my
proposed framework, and included a column for keywords if
people really want to search by word phrases.</font></font></p>
<p><font size="+1"><font face="Lucida Grande">I hope this may be
useful. We are likely to be working with this document for a
long time, so I think the sorting framework which we
ultimately use may be more important than it appears at
first glance. It is really a coding mechanism for
qualitative analysis, so it could introduce bias into our
results if we are not careful. My rough attempt obviously
reflects my own analysis of how to sort the data, and as
Chuck mentioned, each person would pick keywords
differently, but I hope you agree after reading it that the
matter deserves a bit more reflection. I would be happy to
answer any questions.<br>
</font></font></p>
<p><font size="+1"><font face="Lucida Grande">Stephanie Perrin</font></font><br>
</p>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org">gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg</a></pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>