<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=Windows-1252">
</head>
<body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 14px; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;">
<div>
<div>Hi Stephanie, </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Thanks for taking a deeper look at the keyword groups I chose when reviewing all the possible requirements. I think the analysis you are working on is the natural next step in looking at the possible requirements. </div>
<div>The keyword exercise was simply to make it easier to group similar PR and make sure we didn’t leave anything out and that appears to be where you are going. I do wonder why you left out keyword groups A, T, Y, Ab and Aw? </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Thanks again for taking the next step. </div>
<div>
<div>
<div>Susan Kawaguchi</div>
<div>Domain Name Manager </div>
<div>Facebook Legal Dept. </div>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION">
<div style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11pt; text-align:left; color:black; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0in; PADDING-LEFT: 0in; PADDING-RIGHT: 0in; BORDER-TOP: #b5c4df 1pt solid; BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; PADDING-TOP: 3pt">
<span style="font-weight:bold">From: </span><<a href="mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org">gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org</a>> on behalf of Stephanie Perrin <<a href="mailto:stephanie.perrin@mail.utoronto.ca">stephanie.perrin@mail.utoronto.ca</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Date: </span>Sunday, July 24, 2016 at 7:50 PM<br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">To: </span>"<a href="mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org">gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org</a>" <<a href="mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org">gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org</a>>, "Gomes, Chuck" <<a href="mailto:cgomes@verisign.com">cgomes@verisign.com</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Subject: </span>[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] possible alternative "groups"<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<p><font size="+1"><font face="Lucida Grande">As discussed in the call last week (July 20th), I had some alternative thoughts on the categories chosen to sort our triage spreadsheet, while very much appreciating the amount of work Lisa and Susan have already
done on it. Chuck asked me if I could come up with an alternative, as he did not want to slow down to tinker with the categories, which everyone might select differently. Accordingly, I have come up with what I hope is a framework of categories that relies
more on the type of potential requirement (eg. function, technical, legal, etc) rather than keywords. I have put almost all of the other groups into what I think are the logical slots in my proposed framework, and included a column for keywords if people
really want to search by word phrases.</font></font></p>
<p><font size="+1"><font face="Lucida Grande">I hope this may be useful. We are likely to be working with this document for a long time, so I think the sorting framework which we ultimately use may be more important than it appears at first glance. It is really
a coding mechanism for qualitative analysis, so it could introduce bias into our results if we are not careful. My rough attempt obviously reflects my own analysis of how to sort the data, and as Chuck mentioned, each person would pick keywords differently,
but I hope you agree after reading it that the matter deserves a bit more reflection. I would be happy to answer any questions.<br>
</font></font></p>
<p><font size="+1"><font face="Lucida Grande">Stephanie Perrin</font></font><br>
</p>
</div>
</div>
</span>
</body>
</html>