<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<p><font size="+1"><font face="Lucida Grande">Here is a new version,
my apologies for missing a couple. Here are the changes:</font></font></p>
<p><font size="+1"><font face="Lucida Grande">A was filed under A
Goals<br>
</font></font></p>
<p><font size="+1"><font face="Lucida Grande">T under AB
differentiated access</font></font></p>
<p><font size="+1"><font face="Lucida Grande">Y Internalization: as
indicated, I don't understand what this means so could not
place it.</font></font></p>
<p><font size="+1"><font face="Lucida Grande">Ab under EC
Jurisdiction issues (typo, it was showing Aa there, Aa was
actually under DB accuracy)</font></font></p>
<p><font size="+1"><font face="Lucida Grande">Aw I could not find an
Aw on the key for the spreadsheet that was discussed last
week. What category is Aw?<br>
</font></font></p>
<p><font size="+1"><font face="Lucida Grande">I hope that clears up
the typos and omissions.</font></font></p>
<p><font size="+1"><font face="Lucida Grande">cheers Stephanie</font></font><br>
</p>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2016-07-25 23:16, Stephanie Perrin
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:350604f5-9a8a-8cec-c399-77135ba4ef46@mail.utoronto.ca"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=windows-1252">
<p><font size="+1"><font face="Lucida Grande">Gosh I thought I had
only left out one....sorry, will check back and reply in
time for tomorrow. Perhaps one of my versions did not save
properly. Will fix prior to the meeting...</font></font></p>
<p><font size="+1"><font face="Lucida Grande">cheers Stephanie</font></font><br>
</p>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2016-07-25 19:02, Susan Kawaguchi
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:D3BBE639.6DCDD%25susank@fb.com" type="cite">
<div>
<div>Hi Stephanie, </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Thanks for taking a deeper look at the keyword groups I
chose when reviewing all the possible requirements. I think
the analysis you are working on is the natural next step in
looking at the possible requirements. </div>
<div>The keyword exercise was simply to make it easier to
group similar PR and make sure we didn’t leave anything out
and that appears to be where you are going. I do wonder why
you left out keyword groups A, T, Y, Ab and Aw? </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Thanks again for taking the next step. </div>
<div>
<div>
<div>Susan Kawaguchi</div>
<div>Domain Name Manager </div>
<div>Facebook Legal Dept. </div>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION">
<div style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11pt;
text-align:left; color:black; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none;
BORDER-LEFT: medium none; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0in; PADDING-LEFT:
0in; PADDING-RIGHT: 0in; BORDER-TOP: #b5c4df 1pt solid;
BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; PADDING-TOP: 3pt"> <span
style="font-weight:bold">From: </span><<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org">gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org</a>>
on behalf of Stephanie Perrin <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:stephanie.perrin@mail.utoronto.ca">stephanie.perrin@mail.utoronto.ca</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Date: </span>Sunday, July
24, 2016 at 7:50 PM<br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">To: </span>"<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org">gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org</a>"
<<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org">gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org</a>>,
"Gomes, Chuck" <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:cgomes@verisign.com">cgomes@verisign.com</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Subject: </span>[gnso-rds-pdp-wg]
possible alternative "groups"<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<p><font size="+1"><font face="Lucida Grande">As discussed
in the call last week (July 20th), I had some
alternative thoughts on the categories chosen to
sort our triage spreadsheet, while very much
appreciating the amount of work Lisa and Susan have
already done on it. Chuck asked me if I could come
up with an alternative, as he did not want to slow
down to tinker with the categories, which everyone
might select differently. Accordingly, I have come
up with what I hope is a framework of categories
that relies more on the type of potential
requirement (eg. function, technical, legal, etc)
rather than keywords. I have put almost all of the
other groups into what I think are the logical slots
in my proposed framework, and included a column for
keywords if people really want to search by word
phrases.</font></font></p>
<p><font size="+1"><font face="Lucida Grande">I hope this
may be useful. We are likely to be working with this
document for a long time, so I think the sorting
framework which we ultimately use may be more
important than it appears at first glance. It is
really a coding mechanism for qualitative analysis,
so it could introduce bias into our results if we
are not careful. My rough attempt obviously
reflects my own analysis of how to sort the data,
and as Chuck mentioned, each person would pick
keywords differently, but I hope you agree after
reading it that the matter deserves a bit more
reflection. I would be happy to answer any
questions.<br>
</font></font></p>
<p><font size="+1"><font face="Lucida Grande">Stephanie
Perrin</font></font><br>
</p>
</div>
</div>
</span> </blockquote>
<br>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org">gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg</a></pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>