<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:comic sans ms,sans-serif;font-size:small">Stephanie has produced some really good work here. I fully endorse this framework and urge its adoption.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:comic sans ms,sans-serif;font-size:small"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:comic sans ms,sans-serif;font-size:small">-Carlton</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all"><div><div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><br>==============================<br>Carlton A Samuels<br>Mobile: 876-818-1799<br><i><font color="#33CC00">Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround</font></i><br>=============================</div></div>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 9:50 PM, Stephanie Perrin <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:stephanie.perrin@mail.utoronto.ca" target="_blank">stephanie.perrin@mail.utoronto.ca</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<p><font size="+1"><font face="Lucida Grande">As discussed in the
call last week (July 20th), I had some alternative thoughts on
the categories chosen to sort our triage spreadsheet, while
very much appreciating the amount of work Lisa and Susan have
already done on it. Chuck asked me if I could come up with an
alternative, as he did not want to slow down to tinker with
the categories, which everyone might select differently.
Accordingly, I have come up with what I hope is a framework of
categories that relies more on the type of potential
requirement (eg. function, technical, legal, etc) rather than
keywords. I have put almost all of the other groups into what
I think are the logical slots in my proposed framework, and
included a column for keywords if people really want to search
by word phrases.</font></font></p>
<p><font size="+1"><font face="Lucida Grande">I hope this may be
useful. We are likely to be working with this document for a
long time, so I think the sorting framework which we
ultimately use may be more important than it appears at first
glance. It is really a coding mechanism for qualitative analysis,
so it could introduce bias into our results if we are not
careful. My rough attempt obviously reflects my own analysis
of how to sort the data, and as Chuck mentioned, each person
would pick keywords differently, but I hope you agree after
reading it that the matter deserves a bit more reflection. I
would be happy to answer any questions.<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
</font></span></font></font></p><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">
<p><font size="+1"><font face="Lucida Grande">Stephanie Perrin</font></font><br>
</p>
</font></span></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org">gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg</a><br></blockquote></div><br></div>