<html>
<body>
Dear all,<br><br>
With regard to action item #3 below, attached please find a small excerpt
from draft 4 of the triaged possible requirements list, containing only
those PRs marked "??" for review and possible deletion. During
triage, we could not find a direct link between these PRs and
registration directory services and so were unable to assign them codes
and keywords. WG members are therefore asked to consider if and how
these flagged PRs are relevant to the RDS.<br><br>
Best regards,<br>
Lisa<br><br>
<br>
At 12:33 AM 9/21/2016, Marika Konings wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite=""><i>3. Review Draft 4 of triaged
possible requirements list<br>
</i>· Discuss possible deletion of flagged PRs (those marked
"??")<br>
· Discuss WG feedback on phase, code, and keyword mappings<br>
· Identify essential missing inputs (if any) and plan to include
them<br>
<br>
<b>Action item #2</b>: WG members to review latest version of triaged
possible requirements, including specific questions identified, in order
to commence deliberations. <br>
<br>
<b>Action item #3</b>: Staff to circulate possible deletion of flagged
PRs to mailing list to encourage input by WG members ahead of next week's
meeting</blockquote></body>
</html>