<html>
<body>
Dear all, here is the link to participate in this week's poll:<br><br>
<a href="https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/99RPWSY" eudora="autourl">
https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/99RPWSY<br><br>
</a>Responses should be submitted through the above URL. For offline
reference, a PDF of poll questions can also be found at: <br><br>
<a href="https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/64071050/Poll-on-Purpose-from-28FebCall.pdf" eudora="autourl">
https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/64071050/Poll-on-Purpose-from-28FebCall.pdf</a>
<br><br>
<b>This poll will remain open until COB Saturday 4 March.<br><br>
<br>
</b>At 11:52 AM 3/3/2017, Gomes, Chuck wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">This week’s poll is
particularly important but as of now only eight (8) members completed
it. I hope that many more will complete it today and tomorrow.<br>
<br>
It is helpful if the poll is completed by both those who were on the call
on Tuesday and those who were not.<br>
<br>
Chuck<br>
<a name="_MailEndCompose"></a> <br>
<b>From:</b> gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org
[<a href="mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org" eudora="autourl">
mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org</a>] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Lisa
Phifer<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, February 28, 2017 1:46 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org<br>
<b>Subject:</b> [EXTERNAL] Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Notes, action items and
WG agreements from today's meeting<br>
<br>
Dear all,<br><br>
Calling your attention to <b>Action item #1</b>: <br><br>
<b>WG members requested to provide input on proposed questions to this
mailing list by <u>Friday 3 March at the latest</u>.<br><br>
</b>Attached please find the set of proposed questions introduced during
today's WG call. This draft was developed by a small group of WG
volunteers as explained in the document itself, in preparation for both
the RDS PDP WG's Wednesday F2F session at ICANN58 and the Monday
cross-community session with data protection experts.<br><br>
To make the best use of limited session time, we need to further narrow
this draft list down. Feedback on prioritization is especially welcome to
help the WG focus on those questions most likely to yield answers that
will aid the WG in moving forward.<br><br>
Best, Lisa<br><br>
<br>
At 11:20 AM 2/28/2017, Marika Konings wrote:<br><br>
<dl>
<dd>Dear All,<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>Please find below the notes, action items and WG agreements from
today̢۪s meeting. Note that the ue upcoming WG meetings are scheduled
as follows:<br>
<dd>
<dd>RDS PDP WG Call -- Tuesday 7 March 2017 at 17.00 UTC
<dd>RDS PDP WG F2F -- Saturday 11 March 2017 1:45-4:45 pm - See
<a href="http://sched.co/9npN">http://sched.co/9npN</a> for further
details.
<dd>RDS PDP WG Wrap-Up -- Wednesday 15 March 2017 1:45-3:00 pm. See
<a href="http://sched.co/9npc">http://sched.co/9npc</a> for further
details.
<dd> <br>
<dd>Best regards,<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>Marika<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>Notes RDS PDP WG meeting 28 February 2017 <br>
<dd> <br>
</b>
<dd>These high-level notes are designed to help PDP WG members navigate
through the content of the call and are not meant as a substitute for the
transcript and/or recording. The MP3, transcript, and chat are provided
separately and are posted on the wiki at</i>
<a href="https://community.icann.org/x/HIzRAw">
https://community.icann.org/x/HIzRAw</a><br>
</i>
<dd> <br>
<dd>1. Roll call / SOI<br>
</i>
<dd>· Roll call will
be taken from Adobe Connect<br>
<dd>· Please state
name for transcription purposes and remember to mute your microphone when
not speaking<br>
<dd>· Call will be
chaired by Michele Neylon today<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>2. Review draft questions to discuss with Data Commissioners in
Copenhagen<br>
</i>
<dd>a. Note WG plans to meet with DCs and Interpol's Caroline Goemans on
Wednesday in Copenhagen<br>
<dd>· To take
advantage of their presence in Copenhagen as well as the relevance to the
current WG discussion<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>b. Susan to introduce draft list developed by small group: Questions
for Data Commissioners v5.pdf<br>
<dd>· See draft
questions shared - more questions suggested than can possibly be asked.
Leadership team went through the proposed questions and has re-organised
/ categorized the questions. A number of questions have been parked for
now as may not be a priority or not directly relevant to WG
deliberations. <br>
<dd>· Need to further
narrow list down. Priority should be given to those questions that will
aid the WG in moving forward.<br>
<dd>· Need to make
sure that the questions are laid out in clear simple terms as not all may
be familiar with WHOIS or some of the technical terms.<br>
<dd>· Some of these
questions may be addressed in cross-community sessions, but as it is an
open session, there may be many others asking questions. Make sure that
in the Wednesday session any questions are covered that are of particular
importance to WG's work. <br>
<dd>· Wednesday RDS
PDP WG session will include guests to help answer these questions: - Joe
Cannataci, UN Special Rapporteur on the right to privacy- Caroline
Goemans, Interpol Data Protection Officer- TBD, from the European Data
Protection Supervisor- Peter Kimpian, Data Protection Unit of the Council
of Europe.<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>Action item #1</b>: WG members requested to provide input on proposed
questions by Friday 3 March at the latest. Leadership team to review
input and finalise questions for submission to data protection
commissioners in advance of Wednesday's WG meeting. <br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>c. Action for WG members to provide feedback on-list by end of the
week<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>3. Continue deliberation on the Purpose charter question:<br>
</i>
<dd>Question 2.3: What should the over-arching purpose be of collecting,
maintaining, and providing access to gTLD registration (thin) data?<br>
<dd>a. Review & discuss 22 February poll results:
SummaryResults-Poll-on-Purpose-from-22FebCall.pdf<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>Q2 - should consistency with ICANN's mission be a goal for each RDS
Purpose<br>
<dd>· In relation to
question on not being able to find mission, please see briefing materials
from previous session
(<a href="https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/64071050/28FebMeeting-Handout.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1488216756000" eudora="autourl">
</a><a href="https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/64071050/28FebMeeting-Handout.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1488216756000" eudora="autourl">https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/64071050/28FebMeeting-Handout.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1488216756000</a>
)<br>
<dd>· Nearly 85%
agreed that "Consistency with ICANN's mission" should be a goal
for each RDS purpose<br>
<dd>· Is it within
domain to decide for which secondary purposes data is used? First need to
decide what is going to be within RDS. Whether law enforcement is a
purpose for collection or access is within the scope of this WG to
recommend. Nothing is being foreclosed for now but will need to be
further discussed. <br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>Q3 - should consistency with other consensus policies that pertain to
gTLDs be a goal for each RDS purpose?<br>
<dd>· Just over 70%
agreed that "Consistency with other consensus policies that pertain
to gTLDs" should be a goal for each RDS purpose.<br>
<dd>· End result
should definitely be consistency, but this shouldn't unnecessarily
constrain the WG. <br>
<dd>· Leadership team
observations: This WG's policy recommendations may require updates to
aspects of other policies that relate directly to WHOIS/RDDS. If this
WG's recommendations introduce inconsistencies with other policies, the
IRT would be given direction to identify any updates that need to be made
to other policies for consistency (e.g., new terminology), superseding
other requirements that relate directly to RDDS. Consider possible goal
rephrasing to acknowledge this?<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>Q4 - Should "to provide a framework that enables compliance with
applicable laws" be a goal for each RDS purpose?<br>
<dd>· Over 85% agreed
that "Providing a framework that enables compliance with applicable
laws" should be a goal for each RDS purpose.<br>
<dd>· Those who
disagreed noted that: Not all purposes are related to applicable laws and
General laws applicable to a subject matter might not apply in certain
cases.<br>
<dd>· May wish to
suggest adding this as a footnote to the statement of purpose?<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>b. Action item to capture confirmed agreements in Section 2.3.2 of
working draft<br>
<dd>· All rough
agreements are being added to our working document to help us track
points that have been covered. See
<a href="https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/56986791/KeyConceptsDeliberation-WorkingDraft-22February2017.pdf">
https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/56986791/KeyConceptsDeliberation-WorkingDraft-22February2017.pdf</a>
<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>c. Resume deliberation on this WG's draft statement of purpose -- see
28FebMeeting-Handout.pdf<br>
<dd>· Review draft in
light of discussions to date, in particular in relation to the data
protection concepts / requirements discussed. Does the draft statement
align with those concepts / requirements or should updates be
considered?<br>
<dd>· #3 -
"facilitate" does not necessarily equate to open access<br>
<dd>· Concept of
accurate data is not a problem from the perspective of data protection
legislation. Actually a high level requirement. <br>
<dd>· If there is a
poll on this statement of purpose, would you be in support or if not,
what objections would you be raising?<br>
<dd>· Nothing
necessarily causing concern but there may be elements missing? WG may
need a little bit more time to review. <br>
<dd>· Might be issues
with how specific these purposes are from a EU data protection
perspective? Combination of purposes for RDS and the collection of data
may have complicated matters? May need a closer review from a data
protection perspective. Possibly ask data protection commissioner's for
guidance on how specific purposes must be? Unlikely that they will give
specific input on the statement, but more likely to describe purpose in a
more general way. <br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>Action item #2</b>: Staff to develop and circulate poll on statement
of purpose<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>4. Confirm action items and proposed decision points<br>
</i>
<dd> <br>
<dd>Action item #1</b>: WG members requested to provide input on proposed
questions by Friday 3 March at the latest. Leadership team to review
input and finalise questions for submission to data protection
commissioners in advance of Wednesday's WG meeting.<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>Action item #2</b>: Staff to develop and circulate poll on statement
of purpose<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>WG Agreement #1</b>: "Consistency with ICANN's mission"
should be a goal for each RDS purpose<br>
<dd>WG Agreement #2</b>: "Consistency with other consensus policies
that pertain to gTLDs" should be a goal for each RDS purpose.<br>
<dd>WG Agreement #3</b>: "Providing a framework that enables
compliance with applicable laws" should be a goal for each RDS
purpose.<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>5. Confirm next meeting dates</i>:<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>· RDS PDP WG Call
-- Tuesday 7 March 2017 at 17.00 UTC<br>
<dd>· Saturday session
will be continuation of deliberation, Wednesday session will be devoted
to data protection Q&A<br>
<dd>· RDS PDP WG F2F
-- Saturday 11 March 2017 1:45-4:45 pm - aim to detail agenda with
timings so that those that are in other sessions are able to join for the
items of main importance. See
<a href="http://sched.co/9npN">http://sched.co/9npN</a> for further
details. <br>
<dd>· RDS PDP WG
Wrap-Up -- Wednesday 15 March 2017 1:45-3:00 pm. See
<a href="http://sched.co/9npc">http://sched.co/9npc</a> for further
details.<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>Marika Konings<br>
</b>
<dd>Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO,, Inteernet
Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) <br>
<dd>Email:
<a href="mailto:marika.konings@icann.org">marika.konings@icann.org</a>
<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO<br>
<dd>Find out more about the GNSO by taking our
<a href="http://learn.icann.org/courses/gnso">interactive courses</a> and
visiting the
<a href="http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-efforts.htm#newcomers">
GNSO Newcomer pages</a>. <br>
</i>
<dd> <br>
<dd>_______________________________________________<br>
<dd>gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list<br>
<dd><a href="mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org">
gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org</a><br>
<dd>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg" eudora="autourl">
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg</a><br><br>
</dl><br><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list<br>
gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org<br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg" eudora="autourl">
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg</a></blockquote>
</body>
</html>