<html>
<body>
Apologies, annotated summary results link didn't copy into email
correctly. It is:<br><br>
<a href="https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/64078603/AnnotatedResultsV2-Poll-from-11AprilCall.pdf" eudora="autourl">
https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/64078603/AnnotatedResultsV2-Poll-from-11AprilCall.pdf</a>
<br><br>
Lisa<br><br>
<br>
At 05:15 PM 4/17/2017, Lisa Phifer wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite=""><font face="Calibri">Dear
all,<br><br>
The next GNSO Next-Gen RDS PDP Working Group teleconference will take
place on <b>Wednesday, 19 April at 05.00 UTC </b>(which for
some still late Tuesday evening). <br><br>
Below please find the proposed agenda for this meeting, along with links
to meeting materials, which can all be found on the meeting page:
<a href="https://community.icann.org/x/C8PRAw" eudora="autourl">
https://community.icann.org/x/C8PRAw</a><br><br>
In particular, you may wish to review annotated poll results (link
below) to prepare for agenda item 3.<br><br>
Regards,<br>
Lisa<br><br>
<u>Proposed Agenda for WG Meeting - 19 April at 05.00 UTC<br><br>
</u>1) Roll Call/SOI Updates<br><br>
2) Updates on in-progress tasks<br>
a) ccTLD questions<br>
b) Definition of authoritative<br><br>
3) Start discussion of privacy expert answers (30 minutes)<br>
a) Review poll results Q3 & Q4<br>
b) Discuss possible key concepts and follow-up
questions<br>
See
<a href="https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/64078601/ICANN58-Privacy-Panel-Responses-Draft-7April2017.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1491837560000&api=v2">
<b>ICANN58-Privacy-Panel-Responses-Draft-7April2017.pdf<br>
</a></b> and
<a href="https://community.icann.org/"><b>Annotated Summary Poll
Results<br>
</a></b> c) Continue deliberation on the charter
question/subquestion 4.1:<br>
<i> For thin data only -- Do existing gTLD
RDS policies sufficiently <br>
address compliance with applicable data
protection, privacy, and free <br>
speech laws within each jurisdiction? If
not, what requirements might<br>
those laws place on RDS policies regarding
purposes associated with thin data?<br><br>
</i>4) Continue deliberation on the charter question/subquestion 3.1
(rephrased):<br>
<i> What are the purpose(s) of each existing gTLD
thin registration data element?<br>
Do they sufficiently meet the needs of purposes
identified as legitimate?<br>
</i> See Q2 poll response and
<a href="https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/64078512/Merged-ThinDataPurposes-v1.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1491326385000&api=v2">
<b>Merged-ThinDataPurposes-v1.pdf</a><br><br>
</b>5) Confirm action items and proposed decision points<br>
6) Confirm next meeting date: 25 April, 2017 at 16:00 UTC <br>
<br>
<b>Meeting Materials:</b>
<a href="https://community.icann.org/x/C8PRAw" eudora="autourl">
https://community.icann.org/x/C8PRAw</a><br>
</font>_______________________________________________<br>
gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list<br>
gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org<br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg" eudora="autourl">
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg</a></blockquote>
</body>
</html>