<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:comic sans ms,sans-serif;font-size:small">+++++1. I am gobsmacked wondering why we're back at litigating what is 'thin data'? For the wackiest of hard-line European privacy maven has conceded the sense of it!!</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:comic sans ms,sans-serif;font-size:small"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:comic sans ms,sans-serif;font-size:small">Christ on a bike. Talk about comfort to the afflicted!!</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:comic sans ms,sans-serif;font-size:small"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:comic sans ms,sans-serif;font-size:small">-Carlton<br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all"><div><div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><br>==============================<br><i><font face="comic sans ms, sans-serif">Carlton A Samuels</font></i><br><font face="comic sans ms, sans-serif"><i>Mobile: 876-818-1799<br><font color="#33CC00">Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround</font></i></font><br>=============================</div></div></div></div>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 7:48 AM, Andrew Sullivan <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ajs@anvilwalrusden.com" target="_blank">ajs@anvilwalrusden.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi,<br>
<br>
On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 11:25:55AM +0200, Volker Greimann wrote:<br>
> Even if there if no PII in thin data (and I am leaning to that direction<br>
> myself), if there really a need for all these fields to be public for the<br>
> purpose of the operationality of the internet? I am thinking of the created,<br>
> updated and expiration dates in particular since those are the ones leading<br>
> to the most abusive use.<br>
<br>
I think I have argued, previously at some length and more briefly in<br>
this thread, how those fields are useful and important for the<br>
operational model of the Internet that prevails because of the<br>
fundamentally distributed naturue of the Internet. You have offered<br>
not one shred of evidence that those fields in particular are "abused"<br>
(the abuse, if it happens, comes from email, and we're talking about<br>
thin data so no email addresses are involved). And you have not<br>
addressed the argument about how the Internet works.<br>
<br>
I therefore believe that, if you want anyone to take seriously the<br>
idea that we need to discuss any of the thin data any more, the burden<br>
of proof lies on you. Please either make such an argument, or let us<br>
finally move on to discussing data where everyone acknowledges there<br>
is a more serious issue.<br>
<br>
In my opinion, we have spent long enough discussing the "simple" case<br>
and artificially making it complicated. It's time to move on to a<br>
real problem.<br>
<br>
Best regards,<br>
<br>
A<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
--<br>
Andrew Sullivan<br>
<a href="mailto:ajs@anvilwalrusden.com">ajs@anvilwalrusden.com</a><br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org">gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/<wbr>listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg</a><br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br></div>