<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p><font size="+1"><font face="Lucida Grande">Calling me naive, ill
informed etc. does not actually answer the question folks.
It is, I am afraid, a valid question. What criteria does an
organization like APWG apply, when it admits members and
shares data with them? How do you ensure you are not sharing
data with organizations who are going to misuse it? that data
of course is much more that what we are talking about with
thin data, but I did actually work on this issue on successive
versions of the anti-spam legislation. Oddly enough,
government lawyers examining the issue (mostly from the
competition bureau who deal with criminal matters) never
labelled me "naive".</font></font></p>
<p><font size="+1"><font face="Lucida Grande">Folks, can we please
try to be polite to one another on this list? When I have questions
like this, I often check with experts before I ask. They
don't call me naive, they answer my questions.</font></font></p>
<p><font size="+1"><font face="Lucida Grande">Thanks again.</font></font></p>
<p><font size="+1"><font face="Lucida Grande">Stephanie</font></font><br>
</p>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2017-06-08 01:54, Neil Schwartzman
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:C13D829D-ED26-4F59-859C-5D55DE1321FE@cauce.org">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
My experience differs slightly. They aren’t ignored. The presence
of these .TLDs is a strong indicator of abuse which bears further
investigation.
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">
<div class="">To the point at hand: I believe the notion of
certifying private cybercrime investigators to be painfully
naive (do I ignore reports from someone without a Internet
Investigator License? Do we disallow them access to data?),
impractical in the developed world, and deeply chauvinistic,
patronizing and exclusionary to our colleagues in emerging
nations where capacity building is exactly what’s needed to
deal with next-gen abuse.</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">
<div>
<blockquote type="cite" class="">
<div class="">On Jun 8, 2017, at 2:36 AM, allison nixon
<<a href="mailto:elsakoo@gmail.com" class=""
moz-do-not-send="true">elsakoo@gmail.com</a>>
wrote:</div>
<br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
<div class=""><span style="font-family: Helvetica;
font-size: 12.800000190734863px; font-style: normal;
font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal;
letter-spacing: normal; text-align: start;
text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space:
normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width:
0px; float: none; display: inline !important;"
class="">We're getting there. Entire top level domains
are already ignored on many networks like .science,
.xyz, .pw, .top, .club, et cetera</span></div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br class="">
</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org">gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg</a></pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>