<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.msonormal0, li.msonormal0, div.msonormal0
{mso-style-name:msonormal;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
span.EmailStyle22
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal>Let me say emphatically that the fact that we are focusing on email now in no ways limits the inclusion of postal or phone contacts. We will still consider those.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Chuck<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><a name="_MailEndCompose"><o:p> </o:p></a></p><span style='mso-bookmark:_MailEndCompose'></span><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><p class=MsoNormal><b>From:</b> gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Greg Aaron<br><b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, July 25, 2017 6:14 PM<br><b>To:</b> lisa@corecom.com; gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org<br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] IMPORTANT: Invitation for Poll from 25 July Meeting<o:p></o:p></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>I’m really surprised that this new poll doesn’t present an option that reflects current ICANN policy. Current ICANN policy requires three means (email, postal, phone). The options that Lisa presented in the last poll and then in the new one today limit to one or two required means. <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>6. Proposed WG Agreement #30 <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>In the 25 July call, both support and opposition were expressed for the following key concept, derived from last week's poll results:<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>In addition to email address, data enabling one alternative method of contact must be collected and included in the RDS.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>The following alternative phrasing has also been proposed:<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Data enabling one or more alternative or preferred methods of contact may also be optionally collected and included in the RDS.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Please indicate below whether you agree with either or neither phrasing of this key concept. To suggest an alternative phrasing for this key concept, use the comment box to do so and explain why.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>a) Agree: In addition to email address, data enabling one alternative method of contact must be collected and included in the RDS.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>b) Agree: Data enabling one or more alternative or preferred methods of contact may also be optionally collected and included in the RDS.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>c) Disagree with this key concept, regardless of phrasing<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>d) Unsure, No Opinion, or Propose Alternative given in comment box below<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>When I filled out the poll today I proposed the following alternative:<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>“In addition to email address, data enabling AT LEAST ONE alternative method of contact must be collected and included in the RDS.”<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Like I said, I’m surprised that this new poll doesn’t present an option that reflects current ICANN policy. If you don’t present that as one of the choices, it won’t get support because it’s not in front of people. <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>All best,<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>--Greg<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><p class=MsoNormal><b>From:</b> <a href="mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org">gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org</a> [<a href="mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org">mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org</a>] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Lisa Phifer<br><b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, July 25, 2017 8:19 PM<br><b>To:</b> <a href="mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org">gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org</a><br><b>Subject:</b> [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] IMPORTANT: Invitation for Poll from 25 July Meeting<br><b>Importance:</b> High<o:p></o:p></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Dear all,<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>In follow-up to this week’s WG meeting, <b>all RDS PDP WG Members</b> are encouraged to participate in the following poll:<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><strong><span style='font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#333333;background:white'><a href="https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/ZF3VFJV"><span style='font-weight:normal'>https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/ZF3VFJV</span></a><o:p></o:p></span></strong></p><p class=MsoNormal><strong><span style='font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#333333;background:white'><o:p> </o:p></span></strong></p><p class=MsoNormal>Responses should be submitted through the above URL. For offline reference, a PDF of poll questions can also be found at:<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><a href="https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/66086734/Poll-from-25JulyCall.pdf">https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/66086734/Poll-from-25JulyCall.pdf</a><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><b>This poll will close at COB Saturday 29 July. Poll results will be discussed in our 1 August WG meeting.<o:p></o:p></b></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Please note that you must be a WG Member to participate in polls. If you are a WG Observer wishing to participate in polls, you must first contact <a href="mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org">gnso-secs@icann.org</a> to upgrade to WG Member.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Regards,<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Lisa<o:p></o:p></p></div></body></html>