<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
        {font-family:Wingdings;
        panose-1:5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;}
@font-face
        {font-family:"Cambria Math";
        panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:Calibri;
        panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
        {margin:0in;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:#0563C1;
        text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:#954F72;
        text-decoration:underline;}
p.msonormal0, li.msonormal0, div.msonormal0
        {mso-style-name:msonormal;
        mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
        margin-right:0in;
        mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
        margin-left:0in;
        font-size:11.0pt;
        font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
span.EmailStyle18
        {mso-style-type:personal;
        font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
        color:windowtext;}
span.EmailStyle19
        {mso-style-type:personal-reply;
        font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
        color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
        {mso-style-type:export-only;
        font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
        {size:8.5in 11.0in;
        margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
        {page:WordSection1;}
/* List Definitions */
@list l0
        {mso-list-id:170224686;
        mso-list-type:hybrid;
        mso-list-template-ids:-56839218 67698689 67698691 67698693 67698689 67698691 67698693 67698689 67698691 67698693;}
@list l0:level1
        {mso-level-number-format:bullet;
        mso-level-text:;
        mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        margin-left:.25in;
        text-indent:-.25in;
        font-family:Symbol;}
@list l0:level2
        {mso-level-number-format:bullet;
        mso-level-text:o;
        mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        margin-left:.75in;
        text-indent:-.25in;
        font-family:"Courier New";}
@list l0:level3
        {mso-level-number-format:bullet;
        mso-level-text:;
        mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        margin-left:1.25in;
        text-indent:-.25in;
        font-family:Wingdings;}
@list l0:level4
        {mso-level-number-format:bullet;
        mso-level-text:;
        mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        margin-left:1.75in;
        text-indent:-.25in;
        font-family:Symbol;}
@list l0:level5
        {mso-level-number-format:bullet;
        mso-level-text:o;
        mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        margin-left:2.25in;
        text-indent:-.25in;
        font-family:"Courier New";}
@list l0:level6
        {mso-level-number-format:bullet;
        mso-level-text:;
        mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        margin-left:2.75in;
        text-indent:-.25in;
        font-family:Wingdings;}
@list l0:level7
        {mso-level-number-format:bullet;
        mso-level-text:;
        mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        margin-left:3.25in;
        text-indent:-.25in;
        font-family:Symbol;}
@list l0:level8
        {mso-level-number-format:bullet;
        mso-level-text:o;
        mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        margin-left:3.75in;
        text-indent:-.25in;
        font-family:"Courier New";}
@list l0:level9
        {mso-level-number-format:bullet;
        mso-level-text:;
        mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        margin-left:4.25in;
        text-indent:-.25in;
        font-family:Wingdings;}
@list l1
        {mso-list-id:198781754;
        mso-list-type:hybrid;
        mso-list-template-ids:1611939002 67698703 67698713 67698715 67698703 67698713 67698715 67698703 67698713 67698715;}
@list l1:level1
        {mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        margin-left:.25in;
        text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l1:level2
        {mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
        mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        margin-left:.75in;
        text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l1:level3
        {mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
        mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:right;
        margin-left:1.25in;
        text-indent:-9.0pt;}
@list l1:level4
        {mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        margin-left:1.75in;
        text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l1:level5
        {mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
        mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        margin-left:2.25in;
        text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l1:level6
        {mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
        mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:right;
        margin-left:2.75in;
        text-indent:-9.0pt;}
@list l1:level7
        {mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        margin-left:3.25in;
        text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l1:level8
        {mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
        mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        margin-left:3.75in;
        text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l1:level9
        {mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
        mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:right;
        margin-left:4.25in;
        text-indent:-9.0pt;}
@list l2
        {mso-list-id:209852221;
        mso-list-type:hybrid;
        mso-list-template-ids:1611939002 67698703 67698713 67698715 67698703 67698713 67698715 67698703 67698713 67698715;}
@list l2:level1
        {mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        margin-left:.25in;
        text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l2:level2
        {mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
        mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        margin-left:.75in;
        text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l2:level3
        {mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
        mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:right;
        margin-left:1.25in;
        text-indent:-9.0pt;}
@list l2:level4
        {mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        margin-left:1.75in;
        text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l2:level5
        {mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
        mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        margin-left:2.25in;
        text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l2:level6
        {mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
        mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:right;
        margin-left:2.75in;
        text-indent:-9.0pt;}
@list l2:level7
        {mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        margin-left:3.25in;
        text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l2:level8
        {mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
        mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        margin-left:3.75in;
        text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l2:level9
        {mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
        mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:right;
        margin-left:4.25in;
        text-indent:-9.0pt;}
@list l3
        {mso-list-id:594704548;
        mso-list-type:hybrid;
        mso-list-template-ids:-972812934 67698689 67698691 67698693 67698689 67698691 67698693 67698689 67698691 67698693;}
@list l3:level1
        {mso-level-number-format:bullet;
        mso-level-text:;
        mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        margin-left:.25in;
        text-indent:-.25in;
        font-family:Symbol;}
@list l3:level2
        {mso-level-number-format:bullet;
        mso-level-text:o;
        mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        margin-left:.75in;
        text-indent:-.25in;
        font-family:"Courier New";}
@list l3:level3
        {mso-level-number-format:bullet;
        mso-level-text:;
        mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        margin-left:1.25in;
        text-indent:-.25in;
        font-family:Wingdings;}
@list l3:level4
        {mso-level-number-format:bullet;
        mso-level-text:;
        mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        margin-left:1.75in;
        text-indent:-.25in;
        font-family:Symbol;}
@list l3:level5
        {mso-level-number-format:bullet;
        mso-level-text:o;
        mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        margin-left:2.25in;
        text-indent:-.25in;
        font-family:"Courier New";}
@list l3:level6
        {mso-level-number-format:bullet;
        mso-level-text:;
        mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        margin-left:2.75in;
        text-indent:-.25in;
        font-family:Wingdings;}
@list l3:level7
        {mso-level-number-format:bullet;
        mso-level-text:;
        mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        margin-left:3.25in;
        text-indent:-.25in;
        font-family:Symbol;}
@list l3:level8
        {mso-level-number-format:bullet;
        mso-level-text:o;
        mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        margin-left:3.75in;
        text-indent:-.25in;
        font-family:"Courier New";}
@list l3:level9
        {mso-level-number-format:bullet;
        mso-level-text:;
        mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        margin-left:4.25in;
        text-indent:-.25in;
        font-family:Wingdings;}
@list l4
        {mso-list-id:633340228;
        mso-list-type:hybrid;
        mso-list-template-ids:1843059810 67698689 67698691 67698693 67698689 67698691 67698693 67698689 67698691 67698693;}
@list l4:level1
        {mso-level-number-format:bullet;
        mso-level-text:;
        mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        text-indent:-.25in;
        font-family:Symbol;}
@list l4:level2
        {mso-level-number-format:bullet;
        mso-level-text:o;
        mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        text-indent:-.25in;
        font-family:"Courier New";}
@list l4:level3
        {mso-level-number-format:bullet;
        mso-level-text:;
        mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        text-indent:-.25in;
        font-family:Wingdings;}
@list l4:level4
        {mso-level-number-format:bullet;
        mso-level-text:;
        mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        text-indent:-.25in;
        font-family:Symbol;}
@list l4:level5
        {mso-level-number-format:bullet;
        mso-level-text:o;
        mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        text-indent:-.25in;
        font-family:"Courier New";}
@list l4:level6
        {mso-level-number-format:bullet;
        mso-level-text:;
        mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        text-indent:-.25in;
        font-family:Wingdings;}
@list l4:level7
        {mso-level-number-format:bullet;
        mso-level-text:;
        mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        text-indent:-.25in;
        font-family:Symbol;}
@list l4:level8
        {mso-level-number-format:bullet;
        mso-level-text:o;
        mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        text-indent:-.25in;
        font-family:"Courier New";}
@list l4:level9
        {mso-level-number-format:bullet;
        mso-level-text:;
        mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        text-indent:-.25in;
        font-family:Wingdings;}
@list l5
        {mso-list-id:783690024;
        mso-list-type:hybrid;
        mso-list-template-ids:437272112 67698689 67698691 67698693 67698689 67698691 67698693 67698689 67698691 67698693;}
@list l5:level1
        {mso-level-number-format:bullet;
        mso-level-text:;
        mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        margin-left:.25in;
        text-indent:-.25in;
        font-family:Symbol;}
@list l5:level2
        {mso-level-number-format:bullet;
        mso-level-text:o;
        mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        margin-left:.75in;
        text-indent:-.25in;
        font-family:"Courier New";}
@list l5:level3
        {mso-level-number-format:bullet;
        mso-level-text:;
        mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        margin-left:1.25in;
        text-indent:-.25in;
        font-family:Wingdings;}
@list l5:level4
        {mso-level-number-format:bullet;
        mso-level-text:;
        mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        margin-left:1.75in;
        text-indent:-.25in;
        font-family:Symbol;}
@list l5:level5
        {mso-level-number-format:bullet;
        mso-level-text:o;
        mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        margin-left:2.25in;
        text-indent:-.25in;
        font-family:"Courier New";}
@list l5:level6
        {mso-level-number-format:bullet;
        mso-level-text:;
        mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        margin-left:2.75in;
        text-indent:-.25in;
        font-family:Wingdings;}
@list l5:level7
        {mso-level-number-format:bullet;
        mso-level-text:;
        mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        margin-left:3.25in;
        text-indent:-.25in;
        font-family:Symbol;}
@list l5:level8
        {mso-level-number-format:bullet;
        mso-level-text:o;
        mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        margin-left:3.75in;
        text-indent:-.25in;
        font-family:"Courier New";}
@list l5:level9
        {mso-level-number-format:bullet;
        mso-level-text:;
        mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        margin-left:4.25in;
        text-indent:-.25in;
        font-family:Wingdings;}
@list l6
        {mso-list-id:1709449221;
        mso-list-type:hybrid;
        mso-list-template-ids:-1972189708 67698689 67698691 67698693 67698689 67698691 67698693 67698689 67698691 67698693;}
@list l6:level1
        {mso-level-number-format:bullet;
        mso-level-text:;
        mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        margin-left:.25in;
        text-indent:-.25in;
        font-family:Symbol;}
@list l6:level2
        {mso-level-number-format:bullet;
        mso-level-text:o;
        mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        margin-left:.75in;
        text-indent:-.25in;
        font-family:"Courier New";}
@list l6:level3
        {mso-level-number-format:bullet;
        mso-level-text:;
        mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        margin-left:1.25in;
        text-indent:-.25in;
        font-family:Wingdings;}
@list l6:level4
        {mso-level-number-format:bullet;
        mso-level-text:;
        mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        margin-left:1.75in;
        text-indent:-.25in;
        font-family:Symbol;}
@list l6:level5
        {mso-level-number-format:bullet;
        mso-level-text:o;
        mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        margin-left:2.25in;
        text-indent:-.25in;
        font-family:"Courier New";}
@list l6:level6
        {mso-level-number-format:bullet;
        mso-level-text:;
        mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        margin-left:2.75in;
        text-indent:-.25in;
        font-family:Wingdings;}
@list l6:level7
        {mso-level-number-format:bullet;
        mso-level-text:;
        mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        margin-left:3.25in;
        text-indent:-.25in;
        font-family:Symbol;}
@list l6:level8
        {mso-level-number-format:bullet;
        mso-level-text:o;
        mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        margin-left:3.75in;
        text-indent:-.25in;
        font-family:"Courier New";}
@list l6:level9
        {mso-level-number-format:bullet;
        mso-level-text:;
        mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        margin-left:4.25in;
        text-indent:-.25in;
        font-family:Wingdings;}
@list l7
        {mso-list-id:1991712666;
        mso-list-type:hybrid;
        mso-list-template-ids:265443700 67698689 67698691 67698693 67698689 67698691 67698693 67698689 67698691 67698693;}
@list l7:level1
        {mso-level-number-format:bullet;
        mso-level-text:;
        mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        margin-left:.25in;
        text-indent:-.25in;
        font-family:Symbol;}
@list l7:level2
        {mso-level-number-format:bullet;
        mso-level-text:o;
        mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        margin-left:.75in;
        text-indent:-.25in;
        font-family:"Courier New";}
@list l7:level3
        {mso-level-number-format:bullet;
        mso-level-text:;
        mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        margin-left:1.25in;
        text-indent:-.25in;
        font-family:Wingdings;}
@list l7:level4
        {mso-level-number-format:bullet;
        mso-level-text:;
        mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        margin-left:1.75in;
        text-indent:-.25in;
        font-family:Symbol;}
@list l7:level5
        {mso-level-number-format:bullet;
        mso-level-text:o;
        mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        margin-left:2.25in;
        text-indent:-.25in;
        font-family:"Courier New";}
@list l7:level6
        {mso-level-number-format:bullet;
        mso-level-text:;
        mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        margin-left:2.75in;
        text-indent:-.25in;
        font-family:Wingdings;}
@list l7:level7
        {mso-level-number-format:bullet;
        mso-level-text:;
        mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        margin-left:3.25in;
        text-indent:-.25in;
        font-family:Symbol;}
@list l7:level8
        {mso-level-number-format:bullet;
        mso-level-text:o;
        mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        margin-left:3.75in;
        text-indent:-.25in;
        font-family:"Courier New";}
@list l7:level9
        {mso-level-number-format:bullet;
        mso-level-text:;
        mso-level-tab-stop:none;
        mso-level-number-position:left;
        margin-left:4.25in;
        text-indent:-.25in;
        font-family:Wingdings;}
ol
        {margin-bottom:0in;}
ul
        {margin-bottom:0in;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body bgcolor=white lang=EN-US link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72"><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>I want to call all members’ attention to action items 1 &amp; 2 that are for all members.  <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Thanks to those who have already participated on the list in the discussion about Registrar Data and RDS data.  I encourage others to join in the discussion.  It would be good if we can reach some conclusions on the list before our next meeting or at least identify the key issues so that we might be able to identify some tentative conclusions in our next meeting.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Regarding action item #3, there were what I believe were a lot of very constructive points made on the WG call yesterday about alternative contacts.  It would be very helpful if some of you would suggest some possible key concepts from the discussion that occurred that the full WG could consider; in doing that, please try to draft key concepts that you think most of the WG could support based on what you heard said in the meeting.  For those who were not on the call, I strongly encourage you to listen to the recording or read the transcript.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Chuck<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><a name="_MailEndCompose"><span style='font-size:11.0pt'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></a></p><span style='mso-bookmark:_MailEndCompose'></span><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:11.0pt'> gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Amr Elsadr<br><b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, August 8, 2017 2:43 PM<br><b>To:</b> gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org<br><b>Subject:</b> [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] IMPORTANT: Action Items and Notes from GNSO Next-Generation RDS PDP WG Call - 8 August 2017<br><b>Importance:</b> High<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Dear Working Group Members,<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Below are the action items and notes from today’s WG call. The action items, notes, meeting documents, AC Chat and recordings are also available on the meeting’s wiki page here: <a href="https://community.icann.org/x/WGfwAw">https://community.icann.org/x/WGfwAw</a><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Transcripts will be posted on the same wiki page, when they are available.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Thanks.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Amr<o:p></o:p></p><div style='border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in'><p class=MsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><u>Action Items:<o:p></o:p></u></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p><ol style='margin-top:0in' start=1 type=1><li class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:-.25in;mso-list:l2 level1 lfo1'>WG members to continue discussion on the topic of the distinction between Registrar Data and RDS Data over the WG mailing list over the coming week, and possibly during the next WG call.<o:p></o:p></li><li class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:-.25in;mso-list:l2 level1 lfo1'>Staff to record in working document the revised WG Agreement #30: For resiliency, data enabling alternative or preferred method(s) of contact should be included in the RDS; further deliberation to determine whether such data element(s) should be optional or mandatory to collect.<o:p></o:p></li><li class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:-.25in;mso-list:l2 level1 lfo1'>WG members to provide suggestions on key concepts over the mailing list, based on today’s call discussion of alternative/preferred contact methods - Suggestions to be submitted by COB Friday, 11 August.<o:p></o:p></li><li class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:-.25in;mso-list:l2 level1 lfo1'>Leadership Team to discuss points covered in today’s call to identify any questions suitable for polling this week; Staff to develop poll at Leadership’s direction – WG members encouraged to participate in this week's poll no later than COB Saturday 12 August.<o:p></o:p></li></ol><p class=MsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><u>Notes:<o:p></o:p></u></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><i>These high-level notes are designed to help PDP WG members navigate through the content of the call and are not meant as a substitute for the transcript and/or recording. The MP3, transcript, and chat are provided separately and are posted on the wiki here: </i><a href="https://community.icann.org/x/WGfwAw"><i>https://community.icann.org/x/WGfwAw</i></a><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>1) Roll Call/SOI Updates<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p><ul style='margin-top:0in' type=disc><li class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:-.25in;mso-list:l3 level1 lfo2'>Margie Milam has joined this WG as a member, and is now an employee of Facebook and a member of the Business Constituency<o:p></o:p></li></ul><p class=MsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>2) Continue deliberation on Data Elements beyond MPDS<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>a) Charter Question: &quot;What data should be collected, stored and disclosed?&quot; focusing first on set of data required in RDS<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p><ul style='margin-top:0in' type=disc><li class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:-.25in;mso-list:l6 level1 lfo3'>See <a href="https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/66086744/RDSPDP-Handout-8AugustCall.pdf?version=1&amp;modificationDate=1502207823000&amp;api=v2">RDSPDP-Handout-8AugustCall.pdf</a><o:p></o:p></li></ul><ul style='margin-top:0in' type=disc><li class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:-.25in;mso-list:l3 level1 lfo2'>Slide 1: Review of recently reached tentative agreements (#25 --&gt; #29 and #31)<o:p></o:p></li><li class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:-.25in;mso-list:l3 level1 lfo2'>Proposed WG Agreement #30 was unpacked for further deliberation as part of the 1 August poll, and will be discussed during this call<o:p></o:p></li><li class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:-.25in;mso-list:l3 level1 lfo2'>All WG agreements are recorded in our working document, the latest version of which is <a href="https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/66086741/KeyConceptsDeliberation-WorkingDraft-1August2017.pdf">https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/66086741/KeyConceptsDeliberation-WorkingDraft-1August2017.pdf</a><o:p></o:p></li></ul><p class=MsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>b) Deliberate on key concepts for alternative contact requirements - see <a href="https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/66086744/AnnotatedResults-Poll-from-1AugustCall.pdf">AnnotatedResults-Poll-from-1AugustCall.pdf</a><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p><ul style='margin-top:0in' type=disc><li class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:-.25in;mso-list:l3 level1 lfo2'>Slide 2 - Question 2 from the 1 August poll: <i>Should alternative or preferred contacts be required in the RDS?</i> <o:p></o:p></li></ul><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in;text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l3 level2 lfo2'><![if !supportLists]><span style='font-family:"Courier New"'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>o<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><![endif]>Split poll result between options a. <i>For resiliency, data enabling alternative or preferred method(s) of contact should be included in the RDS and optional to collect </i>(52%) and c. <i>Same as a, except must be included and mandatory to collect </i>(48%)<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in;text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l3 level2 lfo2'><![if !supportLists]><span style='font-family:"Courier New"'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>o<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><![endif]>Distinction between two options is optional to collect in a. and mandatory to collect in c.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in;text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l3 level2 lfo2'><![if !supportLists]><span style='font-family:"Courier New"'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>o<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><![endif]>&quot;data enabling...contact&quot; means &quot;data element(s) that enable contact through alternative or preferred methods&quot; -- subsequent questions drill down on what data elements that might be<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in;text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l3 level2 lfo2'><![if !supportLists]><span style='font-family:"Courier New"'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>o<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><![endif]>If &quot;should be&quot; is used then &quot;mandatory to collect&quot; is obviously not possible?<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in;text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l3 level2 lfo2'><![if !supportLists]><span style='font-family:"Courier New"'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>o<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><![endif]>As noted in the poll, all poll questions focus only on collection of data; display/disclosure of data will be addressed separately<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in;text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l3 level2 lfo2'><![if !supportLists]><span style='font-family:"Courier New"'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>o<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><![endif]>In reference to email from Michele Neylon and Andrew Sullivan to the WG mailing list, use of the phrase “in the RDS” in the poll questions should be clarified<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in;text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l3 level2 lfo2'><![if !supportLists]><span style='font-family:"Courier New"'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>o<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><![endif]>ACTION ITEM: WG members to continue discussion on the topic of the distinction between Registrar Data and RDS Data over the WG mailing list over the coming week, and possibly during the next WG call.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in;text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l3 level2 lfo2'><![if !supportLists]><span style='font-family:"Courier New"'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>o<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><![endif]>ACTION ITEM: Staff to record in the working document the revised WG Agreement #30: <i>For resiliency, data enabling alternative or preferred method(s) of contact should be included in the RDS; further deliberation to determine whether such data element(s) should be optional or mandatory to collect.</i><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><b>WG Agreement:</b> For resiliency, data enabling alternative or preferred method(s) of contact should be included in the RDS; further deliberation to determine whether such data element(s) should be optional or mandatory to collect.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p><ul style='margin-top:0in' type=disc><li class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:-.25in;mso-list:l3 level1 lfo2'>Slide 3 - Question 3: If so, how many alternative or preferred contact values should be required? <o:p></o:p></li></ul><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in;text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l3 level2 lfo2'><![if !supportLists]><span style='font-family:"Courier New"'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>o<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><![endif]>Support split across choices c. <i>At least two (and possibly more) alternative or preferred contact values must be required in the RDS</i> (33.3%) and f. <i>There should be no specific requirement for a minimum or maximum number of alternative or preferred contact values</i> (41%)<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in;text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l3 level2 lfo2'><![if !supportLists]><span style='font-family:"Courier New"'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>o<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><![endif]>Responses to this question to be discussed in conjunction with question 4<o:p></o:p></p><ul style='margin-top:0in' type=disc><li class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:-.25in;mso-list:l3 level1 lfo2'>Slide 4- Question 4: If so, what type(s) of alternative or preferred contact method(s) should be required? <o:p></o:p></li></ul><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in;text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l3 level2 lfo2'><![if !supportLists]><span style='font-family:"Courier New"'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>o<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><![endif]>Support split across choices b. <i>Alternative or preferred contact data must include additional email addresses (41%)</i>, c. <i>Alternative or preferred contact data must include telephone number(s) to receive voice calls </i>(41%), f. <i>Alternative or preferred contact data must include postal address(es) </i>(37%) and h. <i>There should be no specific requirement for alternative or preferred contact methods </i>(41%)<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in;text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l3 level2 lfo2'><![if !supportLists]><span style='font-family:"Courier New"'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>o<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><![endif]>Selecting more than one choice was possible, so percentages add up to more than 100%<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in;text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l3 level2 lfo2'><![if !supportLists]><span style='font-family:"Courier New"'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>o<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><![endif]>This question discussed in conjunction with question 3 because the WG appears to be divided between those who prefer not to state a specific requirement for number or method, and those who prefer to see two or more alternative or preferred method(s) to include some combination of email, voice, and postal address<o:p></o:p></p><ul style='margin-top:0in' type=disc><li class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:-.25in;mso-list:l3 level1 lfo2'>Discussion on benefit or disadvantage of stating each specific requirement: <o:p></o:p></li></ul><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in;text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l3 level2 lfo2'><![if !supportLists]><span style='font-family:"Courier New"'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>o<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><![endif]>Postal addresses are not a reliable method to achieve contact-ability in some countries - postal address may be an optional method of contact, however, flexibility to provide other reliable alternatives for methods of contact should be permissible<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in;text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l3 level2 lfo2'><![if !supportLists]><span style='font-family:"Courier New"'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>o<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><![endif]>Some jurisdictions require that legal notices be sent to a physical address - Does this create a requirement to collect postal addresses to be included in the RDS?<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in;text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l3 level2 lfo2'><![if !supportLists]><span style='font-family:"Courier New"'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>o<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><![endif]>Other ICANN policies require use of postal mail to contact domain name registrants, such as UDRP providers, who are required to prove, for due process purposes, that they have sent a notice to registrant via postal services<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in;text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l3 level2 lfo2'><![if !supportLists]><span style='font-family:"Courier New"'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>o<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><![endif]>Different jurisdictions and policies have different requirements on contact-ability - should WG step back and consider at a higher level why postal addresses need to be collected? – What is the identified requirement that mandates collection of postal address, and does it fulfill the need for contact-ability?<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p><ul style='margin-top:0in' type=disc><li class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:-.25in;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo4'>Slide 5 – Question 5: <i>If you support requirements for alternative or preferred contact method(s), what is the <u>purpose</u> of collecting this data? </i><o:p></o:p></li></ul><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in;text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l0 level2 lfo4'><![if !supportLists]><span style='font-family:"Courier New"'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>o<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><![endif]>Refer to the 8 August handout for comments submitted by WG members, which were categorized by staff into 5 categories including Contactability, Resiliency, Preference, Abuse Reporting, and Other<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in;text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l0 level2 lfo4'><![if !supportLists]><span style='font-family:"Courier New"'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>o<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><![endif]>Discussion is indicating the need for a plurality of contact methods, such as email, phone and postal address - a requirement to collect all three should assist in ensuring that at least one of them is a reliable/preferred method of contact<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in;text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l0 level2 lfo4'><![if !supportLists]><span style='font-family:"Courier New"'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>o<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><![endif]>Street addresses exist and are applicable to almost everyone, regardless of whether or not it is a reliable method of contact - may serve as a method of identification<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in;text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l0 level2 lfo4'><![if !supportLists]><span style='font-family:"Courier New"'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>o<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><![endif]>If the WG recommends that contact methods such as postal address are not mandatory, then the WG must also note in recommendations that revision to existing policies that require use of these methods of contact would also be needed<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in;text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l0 level2 lfo4'><![if !supportLists]><span style='font-family:"Courier New"'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>o<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><![endif]>Most registrants have structured postal addresses, which provide a method of contact-ability - exceptions to this do not eliminate it as a generally reliable form of contact - any policy arguments against collection of postal address must be compelling<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in;text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l0 level2 lfo4'><![if !supportLists]><span style='font-family:"Courier New"'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>o<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><![endif]>Policy changes that conflict with others, such as the UDRP, may be problematic as these include due process requirements, including the requirement to contact a registrant via postal mail - need expert input on this<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in;text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l0 level2 lfo4'><![if !supportLists]><span style='font-family:"Courier New"'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>o<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><![endif]>RDS PDP WG not restricted in its recommendations due to implications on other policies, however, these implications at a minimum must be noted and taken into consideration<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in;text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l0 level2 lfo4'><![if !supportLists]><span style='font-family:"Courier New"'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>o<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><![endif]>Here we are discussing contact methods, not individual points of contacts (such as contacts taking on admin or tech contact roles) - we will discuss roles later in the agenda, to which each method may apply<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in;text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l0 level2 lfo4'><![if !supportLists]><span style='font-family:"Courier New"'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>o<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><![endif]>Specifying which contact data/methods should be collected is important to take place now during policy development, to avoid it taking place during implementation of the policy in the absence of discussion<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in;text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l0 level2 lfo4'><![if !supportLists]><span style='font-family:"Courier New"'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>o<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><![endif]>Concept of due process on legal proceedings that a person may be party to is broad - not limited to UDRP, which is only an example in which use of postal addresses is required<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in;text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l0 level2 lfo4'><![if !supportLists]><span style='font-family:"Courier New"'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>o<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><![endif]>Collection of data does not imply public access - methods available to restrict/gate access to data, which may be granted to parties for whom legitimate purposes are identified<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in;text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l0 level2 lfo4'><![if !supportLists]><span style='font-family:"Courier New"'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>o<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><![endif]>Data protection laws may require the purposes for collecting this data to be defensible<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in;text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l0 level2 lfo4'><![if !supportLists]><span style='font-family:"Courier New"'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>o<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><![endif]>WG will need to discuss over-collection of data, and consider implications concerning practicality and applicable laws, but not now<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in;text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l0 level2 lfo4'><![if !supportLists]><span style='font-family:"Courier New"'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>o<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><![endif]>Desire for privacy by some should be balanced against desire for due process by others<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in;text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l0 level2 lfo4'><![if !supportLists]><span style='font-family:"Courier New"'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>o<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><![endif]>Summarizing some of the benefits given in chat: ability for sender to confirm receipt, ability to support policies and laws that require postal delivery., ability to determine jurisdiction Summarizing disadvantages: postal address not reliable in some locations and criminals may give fraudulent addresses anyway.&nbsp; <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in;text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l0 level2 lfo4'><![if !supportLists]><span style='font-family:"Courier New"'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>o<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><![endif]>It seems that comments are identifying underlying requirements (not specific to contact method itself) such as: at least one contact must be accurate, at least one contact must be trustworthy, at least one contact must be suitable for use in legal proceedings for due process<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p><ul style='margin-top:0in' type=disc><li class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:-.25in;mso-list:l7 level1 lfo5'>Slide 6 - Based on discussion and comments provided by respondents to 1 August poll Question 5, are there key concepts that the WG can agree on?<o:p></o:p></li></ul><p class=MsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><i>Note: The purpose of the following informal show of hands is probing the level of support for concepts suggested in poll responses, so that poll questions can be constructed to test possible key concepts that may emerge from discussion<o:p></o:p></i></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p><ul style='margin-top:0in' type=disc><li class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:-.25in;mso-list:l5 level1 lfo6'>Show of hands: <i>&quot;Do you support improved contactability as a purpose for collecting alternative contact methods?&quot;</i>: <o:p></o:p></li></ul><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in;text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l5 level2 lfo6'><![if !supportLists]><span style='font-family:"Courier New"'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>o<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><![endif]>11/29 WG members on call supported, 2/29 WG members disagreed<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in;text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l5 level2 lfo6'><![if !supportLists]><span style='font-family:"Courier New"'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>o<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><![endif]>Contact-ability is binary, one can be contact-able or not - text of discussion question needs to be improved<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in;text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l5 level2 lfo6'><![if !supportLists]><span style='font-family:"Courier New"'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>o<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><![endif]>If multiple contact methods are provided, the target may be reached faster or more easily, thus “improving contactability”<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in;text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l5 level2 lfo6'><![if !supportLists]><span style='font-family:"Courier New"'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>o<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><![endif]>One suggestion: Alternative/preferred methods of contact may be limited to 2 methods - in the event of failure to contact a registrant using these methods, may contact the registrant via the registrar<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in;text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l5 level2 lfo6'><![if !supportLists]><span style='font-family:"Courier New"'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>o<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><![endif]>Data in the RDS must allow for retrieval of contact data, and not require a subpoena to the registrar as only option to enable contact<o:p></o:p></p><ul style='margin-top:0in' type=disc><li class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:-.25in;mso-list:l5 level1 lfo6'>Show of hands: <i>&quot;Do you support resiliency to communication failure as a purpose for collecting alternative contact methods?&quot;</i>: <o:p></o:p></li></ul><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in;text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l5 level2 lfo6'><![if !supportLists]><span style='font-family:"Courier New"'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>o<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><![endif]>14/29 WG members on call supported, none disagreed<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in;text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l5 level2 lfo6'><![if !supportLists]><span style='font-family:"Courier New"'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>o<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><![endif]>Several agreed with chat comment: Yes but it should be voluntary by the registrant<o:p></o:p></p><ul style='margin-top:0in' type=disc><li class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:-.25in;mso-list:l5 level1 lfo6'>Show of hands:<i>&quot;Do you support providing contacts with a choice of contact method as a purpose for collecting preferred contact methods?&quot;</i>: <o:p></o:p></li></ul><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in;text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l5 level2 lfo6'><![if !supportLists]><span style='font-family:"Courier New"'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>o<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><![endif]>Question is trying to establish the reasons for collecting either alternative or preferred contact methods, based on comments given in the poll<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in;text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l5 level2 lfo6'><![if !supportLists]><span style='font-family:"Courier New"'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>o<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><![endif]>8/28 WG members on call supported, 3/28 WG members disagreed<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in;text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l5 level2 lfo6'><![if !supportLists]><span style='font-family:"Courier New"'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>o<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><![endif]>Question needs revision, clarification on whether the registrant has the choice of what contact methods may be submitted/collected, or used to contact him/her<o:p></o:p></p><ul style='margin-top:0in' type=disc><li class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:-.25in;mso-list:l5 level1 lfo6'>Show of hands:<i>&quot;Do you support enabling reporting of domain name abuse as a purpose for collecting alternative contact methods?&quot;</i>: <o:p></o:p></li></ul><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in;text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l5 level2 lfo6'><![if !supportLists]><span style='font-family:"Courier New"'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>o<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><![endif]>10/28 WG members on call supported, 3/28 WG members disagreed<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in;text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l5 level2 lfo6'><![if !supportLists]><span style='font-family:"Courier New"'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>o<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><![endif]>Several poll respondents indicated that a purpose for alternative or preferred methods of contact(s) might be to contact the registrant to alert them to domain name abuse or to report abuse<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in;text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l5 level2 lfo6'><![if !supportLists]><span style='font-family:"Courier New"'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>o<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><![endif]>Domain name abuse can be reported, even if no contact methods are available<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in;text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l5 level2 lfo6'><![if !supportLists]><span style='font-family:"Courier New"'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>o<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><![endif]>Might be helpful to have a domain name abuse role, but may not be a good enough reason to have alternative contact methods for the registrant<o:p></o:p></p><ul style='margin-top:0in' type=disc><li class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:-.25in;mso-list:l5 level1 lfo6'>ACTION ITEM: WG members to provide suggestions on key concepts over the mailing list, based on today’s call discussion of alternative/preferred contact methods - Suggestions to be submitted by COB Friday, 11 August<o:p></o:p></li><li class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:-.25in;mso-list:l5 level1 lfo6'>ACTION ITEM: Leadership Team to discuss points covered in today’s call to identify any questions suitable for polling this week; Staff to develop poll at Leadership’s direction – WG members encouraged to participate in this week's poll no later than COB Saturday 12 August<o:p></o:p></li></ul><p class=MsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p><ul style='margin-top:0in' type=disc><li class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:-.25in;mso-list:l5 level1 lfo6'>c) Deliberate on key concepts for role-based contacts - see <a href="https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/66086741/PBC-Overview-1August.pdf">PBC slides from 1 August call</a> (Deferred to next call)<o:p></o:p></li></ul><p class=MsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>3) Confirm action items and proposed decision points<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p><ul style='margin-top:0in' type=disc><li class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:-.25in;mso-list:l6 level1 lfo3'><b>WG Agreement #30:</b> For resiliency, data enabling alternative or preferred method(s) of contact should be included in the RDS; further deliberation to determine whether such data element(s) should be optional or mandatory to collect.<o:p></o:p></li></ul><p class=MsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><b>Action Items:<o:p></o:p></b></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p><ol style='margin-top:0in' start=1 type=1><li class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:-.25in;mso-list:l1 level1 lfo7'>WG members to continue discussion on the topic of the distinction between Registrar Data and RDS Data over the WG mailing list over the coming week, and possibly during the next WG call.<o:p></o:p></li><li class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:-.25in;mso-list:l1 level1 lfo7'>Staff to record in the working document the revised WG Agreement #30: For resiliency, data enabling alternative or preferred method(s) of contact should be included in the RDS; further deliberation to determine whether such data element(s) should be optional or mandatory to collect.<o:p></o:p></li><li class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:-.25in;mso-list:l1 level1 lfo7'>WG members to provide suggestions on key concepts over the mailing list, based on this call’s discussion of alternative/preferred contact methods - Suggestions to be submitted to the mailing list by COB Friday, 11 August.<o:p></o:p></li><li class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:-.25in;mso-list:l1 level1 lfo7'>Leadership Team to discuss points covered in today’s call to identify any questions suitable for polling this week; Staff to develop poll at Leadership’s direction.<o:p></o:p></li></ol><p class=MsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><b>Meeting Materials:<o:p></o:p></b></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p><ul style='margin-top:0in' type=disc><li class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:-.25in;mso-list:l6 level1 lfo3'><a href="https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/66086741/KeyConceptsDeliberation-WorkingDraft-1August2017.pdf?version=1&amp;modificationDate=1501643241000&amp;api=v2"><b>KeyConceptsDeliberation-WorkingDraft-1August2017.pdf</b></a><b>&nbsp;</b>and&nbsp;<a href="https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/66086741/KeyConceptsDeliberation-WorkingDraft-1August2017.docx?version=1&amp;modificationDate=1501643254000&amp;api=v2"><b>doc</b></a><o:p></o:p></li><li class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:-.25in;mso-list:l6 level1 lfo3'><a href="https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/66086741/PBC-Overview-1August.pdf?version=1&amp;modificationDate=1501602782000&amp;api=v2"><b><i>PBC-Overview-1August.pdf</i></b></a><o:p></o:p></li><li class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:-.25in;mso-list:l6 level1 lfo3'><a href="https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/66086744/RDSPDP-Handout-8AugustCall.pdf?version=1&amp;modificationDate=1502207823000&amp;api=v2"><b><i>RDSPDP-Handout-8AugustCall.pdf</i></b></a><o:p></o:p></li></ul><p class=MsoNormal><b><i>1 August Call Poll&nbsp;</i></b><o:p></o:p></p><ul style='margin-top:0in' type=disc><li class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:0in;mso-list:l4 level1 lfo8'><b>Link to participate:</b>&nbsp;Closed@ COB Saturday 5 August<o:p></o:p></li><li class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:0in;mso-list:l4 level1 lfo8'><b>PDF of Poll Questions:</b>&nbsp;<a href="https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/66086741/Poll-from-1AugustCall.pdf?version=1&amp;modificationDate=1501647191000&amp;api=v2">Poll-from-1AugustCall.pdf</a><o:p></o:p></li><li class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:0in;mso-list:l4 level1 lfo8'><b>SurveyMonkey Summary Poll Results:&nbsp;</b><a href="https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/66086744/SummaryResults-Poll-from-1AugustCall.pdf?version=1&amp;modificationDate=1502017860000&amp;api=v2">SummaryResults-Poll-from-1AugustCall.pdf</a><o:p></o:p></li><li class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:0in;mso-list:l4 level1 lfo8'><b>SurveyMonkey Raw Data Poll Results:&nbsp;</b><a href="https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/66086744/RawDataResults-Poll-from-1AugustCall.zip?version=1&amp;modificationDate=1502017845000&amp;api=v2"><b>R</b></a><a href="https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/66086744/RawDataResults-Poll-from-1AugustCall.zip?version=1&amp;modificationDate=1502017845000&amp;api=v2">awDataResults-Poll-from-1AugustCall.zip</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/66086744/RawDataResults-Poll-from-1AugustCall.xlsx?version=1&amp;modificationDate=1502018083000&amp;api=v2">XLS</a><o:p></o:p></li><li class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:0in;mso-list:l4 level1 lfo8'><b>Annotated Survey Results</b>:&nbsp;<a href="https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/66086744/AnnotatedResults-Poll-from-1AugustCall.pdf?version=1&amp;modificationDate=1502125926000&amp;api=v2">AnnotatedResults-Poll-from-1AugustCall.pdf</a><o:p></o:p></li></ul><p class=MsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>4) Confirm next meeting date: 16 August 05.00 UTC <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p></div></body></html>