<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">Em 25 de set de 2017, à(s) 09:46:000, Erica Varlese via gnso-rds-pdp-wg <<a href="mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org" class="">gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org</a>> escreveu:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div dir="ltr" class=""><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"> It is clear that the PDP will have to be aware of and plan for GDPR-like protections (and not limited to Europe).</blockquote><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Jumping back to Kris' comment, and the reference to other privacy regulations in various countries (i.e. South Africa), do we know for certain that GDPR is our best baseline? For example, perhaps there is a different regional set of regulations that are an even lower common denominator that would ensure compliance not only with GDPR, but other regions as well - and, hopefully, future laws. Possibly this has been spoken about before (I'm still rather new here), but I thought it may be worth confirming since so much of our information flow, generally speaking, tends to come from the US and the EU over other regions.</div></div></div></blockquote><br class=""></div><div>Not all privacy regulations are contained in one another; some of them are actually conflicting. For instance, Brazil's constitution forbids anonymity, making both omitting and hiding registrant identification a law breach. </div><div><br class=""></div><div><br class=""></div><div><br class=""></div><div>Rubens</div><div><br class=""></div><div><br class=""></div></body></html>