<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin-top:0in;
margin-right:0in;
margin-bottom:8.0pt;
margin-left:0in;
line-height:106%;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#0563C1;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#954F72;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-US link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72"><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal>With this message I am going to start a new thread. To set the stage let me say that I have read every message on our WG list over the last 24 hours other than any that may have been sent while I am writing this. In doing that I have concluded that we need to step back and adjust our focus on the bigger picture.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>First let me say that we are not dealing with a choice of Whois as we know it today versus no Whois at all, so let’s discard that dichotomous choice. Second, we have sufficient evidence to say that there are regulations in some jurisdictions that forbid the public display of personal information belonging to natural persons the way it happens with currently implemented Whois policy and contractual requirements. Third, all of us as law-abiding citizens, whether individuals or organizations, must obey applicable laws. Fourth, there are many uses of RDS data that provide essential benefits to the Internet community so we as a WG need to figure out ways to obey laws and still achieve the benefits of RDS data access.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>I think it is critical that we recognize that the laws that are mandating change to Whois policy and contractual requirements only impact a subset of any RDS system that is developed. We are not talking about all RDS users in all geographical jurisdictions nor are we talking about all RDS data elements. In the case of the GDPR we are talking about personal information about natural persons who reside in Europe. I acknowledge that other jurisdictions have similar legal restrictions, but I think that the GDRP provides a good starting point. That means that the problem we must solve primarily involves a subset of all RDS users and global jurisdictions.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Fortunately, we now have a protocol that allows us to customize any modification to the existing Whois system or development of a new RDS to accommodate the varying legal requirements by jurisdiction. That will not be a trivial exercise, but it is doable.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>With all that said, let’s remember that we have a large subset of RDS data and RDS users that are not impacted by the various data privacy and data protection regulations around the world. That doesn’t make our job any easier in dealing with the data elements and users who are impacted by such regulations but let’s at least recognize that the problems we must solve do not involve the whole system. I believe we still have the possibility of recommending fairly open access for large numbers of users and data elements; I am not saying whether we should do that or not, but I strongly believe that it will help us to realize that we are not confronting an all or nothing situation.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Finally, let me finish by saying that none of what I said makes our job easy. It will be hard. But I ask every WG member to commit to constructive collaboration with one other to achieve what no other Whois group has ever done. Let’s disagree respectfully, avoid personal criticism, listen carefully to one another and explore creative ways to find solutions to the challenges in front of us.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Thanks for being a part of this WG. Thanks for your patience and diligence in sticking with us.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Chuck <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div></body></html>