<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <p>You are still looking at the wrong end of the horse. Privacy is
      not the choice, it is the default. Divulging data is the choice.<br>
    </p>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 13.02.2018 um 17:57 schrieb John
      Bambenek via gnso-rds-pdp-wg:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:07b57b1a-0b47-4da2-6fac-0dd1b45c0e2a@bambenekconsulting.com">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
      <p>Exactly right. As far as I'm concerned if we made privacy a
        free choice, make the fields optional for all I care, and
        whatever they do make is public... we have solved this problem.</p>
      <p>People who ACTUALLY protect society against privacy threats
        have the data to do their jobs, consumers who want privacy have
        a free option for it, and registrars can be in compliance with
        the law.<br>
      </p>
      <br>
      <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2/13/2018 10:54 AM, DANIEL
        NANGHAKA wrote:<br>
      </div>
      <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAD4W+iOkUWZiVn_hrXXFxEpDS4ynP8LNh+aOt0Mbz1myLLe9gQ@mail.gmail.com">This
        is just an example but there is a lot of damage that can be
        caused with data being exposed. In our case we have phone
        numbers, addresses, emails which is required to verification. 
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>This takes us to issue of consent.<br>
          <br>
          On Tuesday, February 13, 2018, John Bambenek via
          gnso-rds-pdp-wg <<a href="mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org"
            moz-do-not-send="true">gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org</a>>
          wrote:<br>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
            .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
            <div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
              <p>Let's be honest here, we're talking about phone numbers
                and email addresses. The threat model is RADICALLY
                different with the data we are talking about.<br>
              </p>
              <br>
              <div>On 2/13/2018 10:45 AM, Stephanie Perrin wrote:<br>
              </div>
              <blockquote type="cite">
                <p>Undeterred by the fact that noone has responded to my
                  last post, I offer the following update to the Equifax
                  breach to further illustrate my point.  As many
                  companies have found out, you don't find out what
                  you've got till it's gone.....a further reason for
                  data minimization and short retention periods.<br>
                </p>
                <div>
                  <table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" height="107"
                    width="787" border="0">
                    <tbody>
                      <tr>
                        <th nowrap="nowrap" valign="BASELINE"
                          align="RIGHT"><br>
                        </th>
                        <td><br>
                        </td>
                      </tr>
                      <tr>
                        <th nowrap="nowrap" valign="BASELINE"
                          align="RIGHT"><br>
                        </th>
                        <td><br>
                        </td>
                      </tr>
                      <tr>
                        <th nowrap="nowrap" valign="BASELINE"
                          align="RIGHT"><br>
                        </th>
                        <td><br>
                        </td>
                      </tr>
                      <tr>
                        <th nowrap="nowrap" valign="BASELINE"
                          align="RIGHT"><br>
                        </th>
                        <td><br>
                        </td>
                      </tr>
                      <tr>
                        <th nowrap="nowrap" valign="BASELINE"
                          align="RIGHT">To: </th>
                        <td><br>
                        </td>
                      </tr>
                    </tbody>
                  </table>
                  <br>
                  <font face="Times New Roman"><font size="3"><a
href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/02/13/equifax_security_breach_bad/"
                        target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">http://www.theregister.co.uk/<wbr>2018/02/13/equifax_security_<wbr>breach_bad/</a><br>
                      <br>
                      <br>
                      <b>Equifax hack worse than previously thought: Biz
                        kissed goodbye to card expiry dates, tax IDs etc</b><br>
                      Pwned credit-score biz quietly admits more info
                      lost<br>
                      By Iain Thomson in San Francisco 13 Feb 2018 at
                      02:13<br>
                      <br>
                      Last year, Equifax admitted <br>
                      <a
href="https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/09/07/143m_american_equifax_customers_exposed/"
                        target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.theregister.co.uk/<wbr>2017/09/07/143m_american_<wbr>equifax_customers_exposed/</a><br>
                      hackers stole sensitive personal records on 145
                      million Americans and hundreds of thousands in the
                      UK <br>
                      <a
href="https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/10/10/equifax_uk_records_update/"
                        target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.theregister.co.uk/<wbr>2017/10/10/equifax_uk_records_<wbr>update/</a><br>
                      and Canada.<br>
                      <br>
                      The outfit already said cyber-crooks "primarily"
                      took names, social security numbers, birth dates,
                      home addresses, credit-score dispute forms, and,
                      in some instances, credit card numbers and driver
                      license numbers. Now the credit-checking giant
                      reckons the intruders snatched even more
                      information from its databases.<br>
                      <br>
                      According to documents provided by Equifax to the
                      US Senate Banking Committee, <br>
                      and <u>revealed this month by Senator Elizabeth
                        Warren (D-MA)</u>, <br>
                      <a
                        href="https://apnews.com/2a51e3e5f9a945978df4ad96246b8ecc"
                        target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://apnews.com/<wbr>2a51e3e5f9a945978df4ad96246b8e<wbr>cc</a><br>
                      the attackers also grabbed taxpayer identification
                      numbers, phone numbers, email addresses, and
                      credit card expiry dates belonging to some Equifax
                      customers.<br>
                      <br>
                      Like social security numbers, taxpayer ID numbers
                      are useful for fraudsters seeking to steal
                      people's identities or their tax rebates, and the
                      expiry dates are similarly useful for online
                      crooks when linked with credit card numbers and
                      other personal information.<br>
                      <br>
                      <br>
                      <b>Contradictory</b><br>
                      <br>
                      "As your company continues to issue incomplete,
                      confusing and contradictory statements and hide
                      information from Congress and the public, it is
                      clear that five months after the breach was
                      publicly announced, Equifax has yet to answer this
                      simple question in full: what was the precise
                      extent of the breach?" Warren fumed in a missive
                      late last week.<br>
                      <a
                        href="https://www.warren.senate.gov/?p=press_release&id=2317"
                        target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.warren.senate.gov/<wbr>?p=press_release&id=2317</a><br>
                      <br>
                      Equifax spokeswoman Meredith Griffanti stressed to
                      The Register today that the extra information
                      snatched by hackers, as revealed by Senator
                      Warren, belonged to "some" Equifax customers. In
                      other words, not everyone had their phone numbers,
                      email addresses, and so on, slurped by crooks just
                      some. How much is some? Equifax isn't saying,
                      hence Warren's (and everyone else's) growing
                      frustration.<br>
                      <br>
                      The senator is a cosponsor of the <u>proposed
                        Data Breach Prevention and Compensation Act, </u><br>
                      <a
href="https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/01/10/credit_reporting_agencies_fines/"
                        target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.theregister.co.uk/<wbr>2018/01/10/credit_reporting_<wbr>agencies_fines/</a><br>
                      which, if passed, would impose computer security
                      regulations on credit reporting agencies, with
                      mandatory fines that would have led to Equifax
                      coughing up $1.5bn for its IT blunder.<br>
                      <br>
                      Some regulation or punishment is obviously needed.<br>
                      <br>
                      No senior Equifax executives were fired over the
                      attack instead the CEO, CSO and CIO were all
                      allowed to retire with multi-million dollar golden
                      parachutes. The US government's Consumer Financial
                      Protection Bureau promised a full investigation
                      into the Equifax affair, and then gave up. On
                      February 7, an open letter [PDF] <br>
                      <a
href="https://www.schatz.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/CFPB%20Equifax%20Letter%202-7-18.pdf"
                        target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.schatz.senate.gov/<wbr>imo/media/doc/CFPB%20Equifax%<wbr>20Letter%202-7-18.pdf</a><br>
                      from 32 senators to the bureau asked why the probe
                      was dropped, and the gang has yet to receive a
                      response. ®<br>
                    </font></font></div>
                <br>
                <fieldset></fieldset>
                <br>
                <pre>______________________________<wbr>_________________
gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
<a href="mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org</a>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/<wbr>listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg</a></pre>
              </blockquote>
              <br>
              <pre cols="72">-- 
--

John Bambenek</pre>
            </div>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
        <br>
        <br>
        -- <br>
        <div dir="ltr">
          <div>
            <div dir="ltr">
              <div>
                <div dir="ltr">
                  <div>
                    <div dir="ltr">
                      <div>
                        <div dir="ltr">
                          <div>
                            <div dir="ltr">
                              <div> <br>
                                Regards <br>
                                Nanghaka Daniel K.<br>
                                <span style="font-size:small">Executive
                                  Director - ILICIT Africa / Chair -
                                  FOSSFA / Community Lead - ISOC Uganda
                                  Chapter / Geo4Africa Lead / Organising
                                  Team - FOSS4G2018</span><br>
                                Mobile +256 772 898298 (Uganda)<br>
                              </div>
                              <div>Skype: daniel.nanghaka<br>
                              </div>
                              <div><br>
                              </div>
                              <div>-----------------------------------------
                                <i><span>"Working for Africa" </span></i>-----------------------------------------<br>
                                <br>
                                <br>
                              </div>
                            </div>
                          </div>
                        </div>
                      </div>
                    </div>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </div>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
        <br>
      </blockquote>
      <br>
      <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
--

John Bambenek</pre>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org">gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg</a></pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>