<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><br class=""><div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On 14 Feb 2018, at 20:49, John Horton <<a href="mailto:john.horton@legitscript.com" class="">john.horton@legitscript.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div dir="ltr" class=""><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;color:#444444">Hmm, well, perhaps it's because I work for a company that processes quite a bit of data with a combination of algorithms and some human review, but I feel pretty confident that there are ways to simplify that with magic algorithms and forms. </div></div></div></blockquote></div><br class=""><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Magic algorithms are fine in pattern detection because there is always a human review at some point or the cost of error is low, like in raising an abuse case that contains wording like supposedly", "allegedly" etc. In this case, every false negative comes with a tremendous liability. </div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Also, if machine-learning technology and deep pockets for lawsuits become a requirement for being a registrar, you can count on the number of registrars dropping to single digits. </div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Rubens</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div></body></html>