<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <p>DPAs are law enforcement and will enforce the law of the land.
      They do not have the option to pick and choose after May 25.</p>
    <p>Maybe it is time for you and your colleagues to start looking at
      other sources of information to ensure you can continue operation
      efficiently once your currently chosen method becomes illegal.
      Remember, you are a data processor too and what you do with that
      data could very well paint a target on your backs that DPS may
      have to deal with.</p>
    <p>Best,</p>
    <p>Volker<br>
    </p>
    <p><br>
    </p>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 15.02.2018 um 02:36 schrieb allison
      nixon:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CACLR7wLexpWU9bYcO7myMtneZTEAHV539OuTg048-hxxODU9sA@mail.gmail.com">
      <div dir="ltr">Hi everyone,
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>I have already begun to hear unrest from my colleagues who
          work in infosec and network operations about the degradation
          of WHOIS, as registrars have already begun to act on their
          own, stripping everything and blocking bulk queriers on
          domains frequently used for attacks. Every day of additional
          uncertainty equals an additional day of victimization.
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div>Why has no one approached the DPAs with the evidence of
            security purposes for WHOIS? How much network degradation
            will we tolerate before someone bothers to give them a
            little hint? How many more judgments from the DPAs are we
            going to read that display clear ignorance of all legitimate
            cybersecurity purposes? Did no one see this coming?</div>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div>Since we are talking about cost benefit analysis, here is
            a quick one I just did that I would like to share with the
            group. I did a quick look for the value of the domain
            registration industry as a whole. Seems to be ~$4 billion.
            The losses incurred by the WanaCry malware are estimated to
            be at ~$8 billion. A single security incident destroying
            value equal to double your entire industry. </div>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div>In May 2017, the FBI stated that over three years the
            "business email compromise" scams have topped ~$5 billion in
            losses, which would be slightly more than one
            domain-industry unit of value, and WHOIS is crucial to
            fighting it.</div>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div>source: <a
href="https://www.reuters.com/article/us-cyber-lloyds-report/global-cyber-attack-could-spur-53-billion-in-losses-lloyds-of-london-idUSKBN1A20AB"
              moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.reuters.com/article/us-cyber-lloyds-report/global-cyber-attack-could-spur-53-billion-in-losses-lloyds-of-london-idUSKBN1A20AB</a></div>
          <div>source: <a
href="https://cira.ca/factbook/domain-industry-data-and-canadian-Internet-trends/domain-name-industry"
              moz-do-not-send="true">https://cira.ca/factbook/domain-industry-data-and-canadian-Internet-trends/domain-name-industry</a></div>
          <div>source: <a
href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/3195010/security/bec-attacks-have-hit-thousands-top-5-billion-in-losses-globally.html"
              moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.csoonline.com/article/3195010/security/bec-attacks-have-hit-thousands-top-5-billion-in-losses-globally.html</a></div>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div>Remember, the whole point of GDPR is to force companies
            to act with more social responsibility. <br>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
      <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
        <div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 6:08 PM, Rubens
          Kuhl <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:rubensk@nic.br"
              target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">rubensk@nic.br</a>></span>
          wrote:<br>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
            .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
            <div
              style="word-wrap:break-word;line-break:after-white-space"><span
                class=""><br>
                <div><br>
                  <blockquote type="cite">
                    <div>On 14 Feb 2018, at 20:49, John Horton <<a
                        href="mailto:john.horton@legitscript.com"
                        target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">john.horton@legitscript.com</a>>
                      wrote:</div>
                    <br
                      class="m_-8827381183644565574Apple-interchange-newline">
                    <div>
                      <div dir="ltr">
                        <div class="gmail_default"
                          style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;color:#444444">Hmm,
                          well, perhaps it's because I work for a
                          company that processes quite a bit of data
                          with a combination of algorithms and some
                          human review, but I feel pretty confident that
                          there are ways to simplify that with magic
                          algorithms and forms. </div>
                      </div>
                    </div>
                  </blockquote>
                </div>
                <br>
                <div><br>
                </div>
              </span>
              <div>Magic algorithms are fine in pattern detection
                because there is always a human review at some point or
                the cost of error is low, like in raising an abuse case
                that contains wording like supposedly", "allegedly" etc.
                In this case, every false negative comes with a
                tremendous liability. </div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>Also, if machine-learning technology and deep pockets
                for lawsuits become a requirement for being a registrar,
                you can count on the number of registrars dropping to
                single digits. </div>
              <span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">
                  <div><br>
                  </div>
                  <div><br>
                  </div>
                  <div><br>
                  </div>
                  <div>Rubens</div>
                  <div><br>
                  </div>
                  <div><br>
                  </div>
                </font></span></div>
            <br>
            ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
            gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list<br>
            <a href="mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org"
              moz-do-not-send="true">gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org</a><br>
            <a
              href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg"
              rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/<wbr>listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg</a><br>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
        <br>
        <br clear="all">
        <div><br>
        </div>
        -- <br>
        <div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature">_________________________________<br>
          Note to self: Pillage BEFORE burning.</div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org">gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg</a></pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>