<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p><font size="+1"><font face="Lucida Grande">exactly</font></font></p>
<p><font size="+1"><font face="Lucida Grande">SP</font></font><br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2018-03-11 15:34, Tapani Tarvainen
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:20180311193457.dmhy7ktg24y2472v@tarvainen.info">
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 02:13:05PM -0500, John Bambenek via gnso-rds-pdp-wg (<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org">gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org</a>) wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">If laws require us to codify rights to natural persons and not to
legal persons such diving into content is a consequence of those
same laws. We didn't make GDPR.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">
Of course GDPR does not require that. It doesn't say anything about
what we should do with legal persons. So as far as GDPR is concerned,
there's no problem in affording legal persons same protection as
natural ones.
In practice the implication is that GDPR protection is required when
in doubt. That is, only known-to-be-legal persons can be excluded.
So we should not look for criteria for natural persons but for legal
ones and treat all domain holders as natural persons until proven
otherwise.
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>