[gnso-review-dt] GNSO Review 360 Assessment - Revised

[Gomes, Chuck]

Mike,

Unless I missed it, I didn’t hear anyone but you advocating for the default being ‘public response’ but I forwarded the IPC position to the RySG list to see if any of our participants feel the same.

Chuck

From: owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org] On Behalf Of Mike Rodenbaugh
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2014 7:38 PM
To: Larisa B. Gurnick
Cc: gnso-review-dt at icann.org; Richard G A Westlake
Subject: Re: [gnso-review-dt] GNSO Review 360 Assessment - Revised

Thanks Larisa.  IPC notes that the confidentiality default has been changed from the previous draft, so that now responses by default will only be viewed by Westlake.  I did not note consensus in the Working Party for such a change.  IPC's position is that the default should be public response, with the clear option for any respondent to choose their particular response to remain confidential.  We see no justification for 'default confidential' response, given the importance of this review and of ICANN's goal to be a transparent organization.  The Working Party and the public should have access to the vast majority of the responses so we can adequately comment on Westlake's analysis of them.

Curious to hear others' thoughts on this issue, and Staff/Westlake justification for making this change.

Mike Rodenbaugh
RODENBAUGH LAW
tel/fax:  +1.415.738.8087
http://rodenbaugh.com

On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Larisa B. Gurnick <larisa.gurnick at icann.org<mailto:larisa.gurnick at icann.org>> wrote:
Dear All,
The Westlake Governance team modified the 360 Assessment based on feedback received last week.  The revised 360 Assessment is available here<https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/GNSO360ReviewUATv3>.  Please provide your final feedback and any additional comments from your constituencies  by  August 1, 23:59 UTC.

The responder now has the option of skipping the detailed questions pertaining to the GNSO Council, Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies.  A responder who is directly involved or is a close observer in any of these groups, will be able to answer detailed questions for as many groups as he/she would like.

The introductory language will be further refined to provide a clear roadmap of the different sections of the Assessment and the options available to the responder.

Please note that staff is in the process of completing a detailed proofing and editing to ensure proper spelling, capitalization, definition of acronyms, etc.

Thank you for your feedback and commitment to making this assessment useful and informative.

Larisa B. Gurnick
Director, Strategic Initiatives
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
larisa.gurnick at icann.org<mailto:larisa.gurnick at icann.org>
310 383-8995<tel:310%20383-8995>


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-review-dt/attachments/20140729/ff343006/attachment.html>